Semantic Segmentation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images Based on TUnet+ Modeling

Main Article Content

S. Hu
L. Li
H. Xiao

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of Optical Coherence Tomography images is critical for assisting clinicians in identifying lesion regions and evaluating disease progression in retinal and cardiovascular disorders. As OCT is an optical electromagnetic-wave imaging modality, segmentation performance is closely related to the interpretation of wave scattering, tissue-layer boundaries, and propagation-induced image features. Existing OCT segmentation models are often limited by high computational complexity and insufficient accuracy, which restrict efficient and reliable clinical application. To address these challenges, this study proposes a lightweight TUnet+ network incorporating an innovatively designed PSE_C2fCIB module. Extensive experiments were conducted on the publicly available GOALS2022 dataset, including 200 deidentified OCT images augmented for training and validation. The results show that TUnet+ achieves state-of-the-art performance, with an accuracy of 99.3%, an F1-score of 95.65%, and a mean Intersection over Union of 91.87%. Through multi-scale feature fusion, channel attention, and efficient contextual modeling, the proposed framework improves the recognition of fine structural boundaries in OCT images. The method provides a robust technical foundation for automated diagnostic support and quantitative disease assessment, and it also demonstrates the value of electromagnetic-wave imaging analysis in biomedical engineering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hu, S., Li, L., & Xiao, H. (2026). Semantic Segmentation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images Based on TUnet+ Modeling. Advanced Electromagnetics, 15(3), 8255–8265. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.3946
Section
Research Articles

References

X. Xu, L. Yu, and Z. Chen, “Effect of erythrocyte aggregation on hematocrit measurement using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2753– 2758, 2008, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2002134.

View Article

W. Xu, D. L. Mathine, and J. K. Barton, “Analog cmos design for optical coherencetomography signal detection and processing,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 485–489, 2008, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.905402.

View Article

W. Jung, J. Kim, M. Jeon, E. J. Chaney, C. N. Stewart, and S. A. Boppart, “Hand-held optical coherence tomography scanner for primary care diagnostics,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 741–744, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2096816.

View Article

A. T. Zavareh and S. Hoyos, “Kalman-based real-time functional decomposition for the spectral calibration in swept source optical coherence tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 257–273, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2953212.

View Article

W. Jung, J. Kim, M. Jeon, E. J. Chaney, C. N. Stewart, and S. A. Boppart, “Hand-held optical coherence tomography scanner for primary care diagnostics,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 741–744, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2096816.

View Article

C. S. Premachandran, A. Khairyanto, K. C. W. Sheng, J. Singh, J. Teo, X. Ying-shun, C. Nanguang, C. Sheppard, and M. Olivo, “Design, fabrication, and assembly of an optical biosensor probe package for OCT (optical coherence tomography) application,” IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 417–422, 2009, doi: 10.1109/TADVP.2009.2013658.

View Article

N. A. Patel, J. Zoeller, D. L. Stamper, J. G. Fujimoto, and M. E. Brezinski, “Monitoring osteoarthritis in the rat model using optical coherence tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 155–159, 2005, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2004.839360.

View Article

S. Lu, C. Y.-l. Cheung, J. Liu, J. H. Lim, C. K.-s. Leung, and T. Y. Wong, “Automated layer segmentation of optical coherence tomography images,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2605– 2608, 2010, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2055057.

View Article

B. Hassan, S. Qin, T. Hassan, R. Ahmed, and N. Werghi, “Joint segmentation and quantification of chorioretinal biomarkers in optical coherence tomography scans: A deep learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 70, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2021.3077988.

View Article

G. Litjens, T. Kooi, B. E. Bejnordi, A. A. A. Setio, F. Ciompi, M. Ghafoorian, J. A. W. M. van der Laak, B. van Ginneken, and C. I. Snchez, “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005.

View Article

O. Oktay, J. Schlemper, L. L. Folgoc, M. Lee, M. Heinrich, K. Misawa, K. Mori, S. McDonagh, N. Y. Hammerla, B. Kainz, B. Glocker, and D. Rueckert, “Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03999

View Article

L. Ngo, J. Cha, and J.-H. Han, “Deep neural network regression for automated retinal layer segmentation in optical coherence tomography images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 29, pp. 303–312, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2931461.

View Article

Y. Tan, W.-D. Shen, M.-Y. Wu, G.-N. Liu, S.-X. Zhao, Y. Chen, K.-F. Yang, and Y.-J. Li, “Retinal layer segmentation in OCT images with boundary regression and feature polarization,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 686–700, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2023.3317072.

View Article

J. Chen, Y. Lu, Q. Yu, et al., “Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306, 2021.

H. Cao, Y. Wang, J. Chen, et al., “Swin-unet: Unet-like pure transformer for medical image segmentation,” in European Conference on Computer Vision. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022, pp. 205– 218.

Z. Liu, Y. Lin, Y. Cao, et al., “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 10012–10022.