Multi objective operation optimization method for flexible resources in industrial parks considering multiple uncertainties of source and load

Main Article Content

W. Liu
Z. L. Song
L. Li
J. M. Zhou
Y. M. Liu
X. L. Chang

Abstract

With the large-scale integration of distributed renewable energy and the increasing volatility of electric and gas loads, traditional deterministic models struggle to accurately characterize the dynamic response behavior of park-level energy systems. To address this issue, this paper proposes a multi-objective operation optimization methodology for park-level flexible resources that accounts for multiple source–load uncertainties. First, an empirical distribution is constructed based on historical source–load forecast error data, and a probability ambiguity set containing the true distribution is formulated using the Wasserstein distance to characterize the multiple uncertainties in both source and load. Second, a min–max distributionally robust optimization model is established with operational cost and carbon emissions as objectives, where the minimization problem corresponds to the search for the optimal operation scheme, and the maximization problem identifies the worst-case probability distribution within the ambiguity set. Furthermore, the model is transformed into a finite-dimensional convex optimization form using strong duality theory, and a weighted fuzzy membership degree method is introduced to achieve an equivalent solution. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed methodology can effectively balance economy, environmental sustainability, and robustness, providing a credible decision-making tool for the optimal dispatch of flexible resources in park-level systems under data-limited scenarios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Liu, W., Song, Z. L., Li, L., Zhou, J. M., Liu, Y. M., & Chang, X. L. (2026). Multi objective operation optimization method for flexible resources in industrial parks considering multiple uncertainties of source and load. Advanced Electromagnetics, 15(3), 10054–10063. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.4204
Section
Research Articles

References

J. Wei, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, et al., “Decentralized demand management based on alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm for industrial park with CHP units and thermal storage,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 120–130, 2022, doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2020.000 623.

T. Wang and X. Yan, “Research on modeling and parameter identification of comprehensive load model of distribution network in industrial park,” Chin. J. Electron., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 264–273, 2024, doi: 10.23919/CJE.2022.00.024.

View Article

J. Wang, Y. Shi, and Z. Yue, “Intelligent demand response for industrial energy management considering thermostatically controlled loads and EVs,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3432–3442, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TII.2018.2875866.

View Article

R. Feng, K. Wang, X. Xu, et al., “Triple-layer optimization of distributed photovoltaic energy storage capacity for manufacturing enterprises considering carbon emissions and load management,” Appl. Energy, vol. 364, Art. no. 123164, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123164.

View Article

G. Madhusudanan and P. S. Iyappan, “Enhanced energy management in microgrid system integrating photovoltaic panels, battery storage and AC grid using advanced techniques,” Energy, vol. 354, Art. no. 140871, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140871.

View Article

W. Xiong, L. Nailiang, H. Mingkang, et al., “Risk-constrained day-ahead scheduling for gravity energy storage system and wind turbine based on IGDT,” Renew. Energy, vol. 185, pp. 904–915, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rene ne.2021.12.111.

E. Mallada, C. Zhao, and S. Low, “Optimal load-side control for frequency regulation in smart grids,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 6294–6309, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TAC.2017.2713529.

View Article

L. Ren, D. Peng, D. Wang, et al., “Multi-objective optimal dispatching of virtual power plants considering source-load uncertainty in V2G mode,” Front. Energy Res., vol. 10, Art. no. 983743, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.20 22.983743.

Y. Ma, L. Yu, G. Zhang, et al., “Source-load uncertainty-based multi-objective multi-energy complementary optimal scheduling,” Renew. Energy, vol. 219, Art. no. 119483, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119483.

View Article

Y. Huang, M. Shahidehpour, et al., “Dual stochastic dual dynamic programming for multi-stage economic dispatch with renewable energy and thermal energy storage,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 5678– 5692, 2023.

C. He, L. Wu, and T. Liu, “Robust co-optimization scheduling of electricity and natural gas systems via ADMM,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 658–670, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2615104.

View Article

A. Maheshwari, Y. R. Sood, and S. Jaiswal, “Flow direction algorithm-based optimal power flow analysis in the presence of stochastic renewable energy sources,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 217, Art. no. 109087, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.109087.

View Article

Z. Liu, H. Fan, et al., “Stochastic planning of integrated energy system based on correlation scenario generation method via Copula function considering multiple uncertainties in renewable energy sources and demands,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2978–2996, 2023, doi: 10.1049/rpg2.12805.

View Article

C. Liu, C. Lee, H. Chen, et al., “Stochastic robust mathematical programming model for power system optimization,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 821–822, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2394320.

View Article

Y. Liu, L. Wu, and J. Li, “A fast LP-based approach for robust dynamic economic dispatch problem: A feasible region projection method,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 4116–4119, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TP WRS.2020.3004058.

W. Liu, M. Fu, M. Yang, et al., “A bi-level interval robust optimization model for service restoration in flexible distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1843–1855, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3038400.

View Article

R. A. Jabr, “Distributionally robust CVaR constraints for power flow optimization,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 3764–3773, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2971684.

View Article

Y. Huang, W. Huang, N. Tai, et al., “A multistage distributionally robust optimization approach for generation dispatch with demand response under endogenous and exogenous uncertainties,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 17, no. 22, pp. 5041–5061, 2023, doi: 10.1049/gtd2.13019.

View Article

W. Wang, M. Wang, X. Han, et al., “Distributionally robust transmission expansion planning considering uncertainty of contingency probability,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1136–1145, 2021.

Y. Zhao, Y. Chen, et al., “An adaptive distributionally robust model for three-phase distribution network reconfiguration,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1224–1237, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2020.30302 99.

H. Yang, et al., “Distributionally robust chance constrained planning model for energy storage plants based on Kullback–Leibler divergence,” Energy Rep., vol. 7, pp. 5203–5213, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.116.

View Article

J. Liu, Y. Chen, C. Duan, et al., “Distributionally robust optimal reactive power dispatch with Wasserstein distance in active distribution network,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 426–436, 2020, doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2019.000057.

View Article

L. Yao, X. Wang, C. Duan, et al., “Data-driven distributionally robust reserve and energy scheduling over Wasserstein balls,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 178, 2018, doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0493.

View Article

J. Liu, Y. Chen, C. Duan, et al., “Distributionally robust optimal reactive power dispatch with Wasserstein distance in active distribution network,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 426–43, 2020, doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2019.000057.

View Article