Enhancing Consistency in Academic English Writing Feedback Generation with a MacBERT-large Model Combining Adversarial Training and Contrastive Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Academic English writing feedback generation requires robust semantic understanding, stable feedback output, and accurate discrimination among similar error types. Existing feedback generation systems often produce inconsistent suggestions for semantically equivalent inputs and show limited generalization to complex academic expressions. To improve feedback consistency, this study proposes an enhanced MacBERT-large encoder–decoder model integrating Fast Gradient Method adversarial training and supervised contrastive learning. The MacBERT-large encoder extracts contextual semantic representations of academic text, while a Transformer decoder generates feedback sequences using a dedicated academic vocabulary. FGM adversarial training introduces controlled perturbations into the embedding layer, enabling the model to maintain stable predictions under paraphrased or slightly varied inputs. A supervised contrastive learning module maps text samples into a representation space where feedback cases with the same error type are pulled closer and different error types are separated through NT-Xent loss. A multi-task learning framework jointly optimizes cross-entropy loss, adversarial loss, and contrastive loss to balance generation quality, robustness, and category discrimination. Experiments on the AEW-Feedback dataset containing 15,000 academic papers show that the proposed model achieves 67.3% BLEU-4, 71.2% ROUGE-L, 74.8% METEOR, and a feedback consistency score of 0.891, outperforming MacBERT-large and single-enhancement variants. The method provides a semantic consistency modeling framework for intelligent text generation and academic writing assistance systems.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
N. Yurko, I. Styfanyshyn, U. Protsenko, et al., “The peculiarities of academic English writing,” Paradigmatic view on the concept of world science - volume 2, 2020, doi: 10.36074/21.08.2020.v2.37.
V. Makarova, Z. Li, and Z. Wang, “Can ChatGPT grade non-native academic English writing? Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design,” 2024:97-116, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-1054-0.ch005.
J. Chen, H. Shen, and S. Hu, “A survey study of a catechism course in academic English writing,” Education Quarterly Reviews, pp. 6(3), 2023, doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.06.03.771.
J. Ma, “A study of the impact of peer review on academic English writing among English majors,” SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 168, pp. 5, 2023, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/202316801005.
H. Li, “Blended assessment in university academic English writing course,” Journal of Education and Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 161-164, 2025, doi: 10.54097/2wkab381.
D. Perrodin D, “Assessment by Thai academic English writing teachers of the flow of given to new topic information within academic writing,” Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 2021, doi: 10.23971/jefl.v11i2.2684.
F. Rahman, “Fostering academic English writing through blended approach: a study of Bengali learners of English,” The Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics, Art. no. 16(31_32), 2024, doi: 10.70438/dujl/163132/0010.
C. Srisawat and K. Poonpon, “Revision of an academic English writing rubric for a graduate school admission test,” PASAA: A Journal of Language Teaching & Learning in Thailand, pp. 65, 2023, doi: 10.58837/chula.pasaa.65.1.9.
Y. Gao and Y. Lou, “A study on teacher’s regulative discourse in online academic English writing course,” Education Reform and Development, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 144-150, 2024, doi: 10.26689/erd.v6i7.7737.
S. Li, “Research on academic English writing teaching based on production-oriented approach,” World Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. p36, 2024, doi: 10.22158/wjer.v11n3p36.