Research on the Construction and Application of New Business Education Integration Teaching Model Empowered by Artificial Intelligence
Main Article Content
Abstract
New business education requires a teaching model capable of dynamically aligning curriculum content, industrial skill demand, project allocation, and practical decision training. To reduce the mismatch between fast-changing industrial requirements and static curriculum revision cycles, this study constructs an AI-empowered industry–education integration model. A dynamic industry-skill knowledge graph is built from 45,600 job postings using BERT and BiLSTM-CRF to extract job-skill entities and relationships. A semantic mapping mechanism calculates the alignment between course syllabi and industry skill nodes, producing curriculum update suggestions. A multi-agent reinforcement learning scheduler then matches students and enterprise projects using ability vectors, project demand vectors, and reward functions considering semantic fit, team complementarity, and resource idleness. Finally, a generative business simulation sandbox based on cGAN and large language models creates dynamic market demand and competitor strategies for decision training. A 16-week controlled experiment shows that AI-driven mapping raises semantic alignment to 0.89, reinforcement learning reduces project-resource idle rate to 5.7%, and generative sandbox training improves students’ strategy innovation and risk-prediction scores by more than 23 points. The model provides an intelligent decision-support framework for adaptive education systems and industry–education resource coordination.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, J. Su, et al., “Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the postpandemic world,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 137-161, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6.
X. O’Dea, “Generative AI: is it a paradigm shift for higher education? Studies in Higher Education,” 2024; 49(5): 811-816, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2332944.
K. Kavitha and V. P. Joshith, “The transformative trajectory of artificial intelligence in education: the two decades of bibliometric retrospect,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 376-405, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00472395241231815.
V. L. Crittenden, “What Is the Future of Marketing Education? Journal of Marketing Education,” 2024; 46(1): 3-5, doi: 10.1177/02734753231220115.
A. Guha, D. Grewal, and S. Atlas, “Generative AI and Marketing Education: What the Future Holds,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 6-17, 2024, doi: 10.1177/02734753231215436.
D. Grewal, A. Guha, C. Beccacece Satornino, et al., “The Future of Marketing and Marketing Education,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 61-77, 2024, doi: 10.1177/02734753241269838.
Kou G.Research on the Teaching Application of AI Corpus-Assisted Expression Training in College Business English Courses.International Journal for Housing Science & Its Applications, 2025, 47(1), doi: 10.70517/ijhsa47148.
J. S. Cook and J. Cook, “Artificial intelligence in management education: transformative potential and challenges,” SAM Advanced Management Journal, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 340-355, 2024, doi: 10.1108/SAMAMJ-05-2024-0026.
D. Pujotomo, S. A. H. Syed Hassan, A. Ma’aram, et al., “University-industry collaboration in the technology development and technology commercialization stage: a systematic literature review,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1276-1306, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-11-2022-0344.
A. L. Rossoni, E. P. G. de Vasconcellos, and R. L. de Castilho Rossoni, “Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review,” Management Review Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1841-1877, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1.
A. Vuoriainen, P. Rikala, V. Heilala, et al., “The six C’s of successful higher education-industry collaboration in engineering education: a systematic literature review,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 26-50, 2025, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2024.2432440.
S. K. Panda, Y. Xiang, and R. Liu, “Dynamic resource matching in manufacturing using deep reinforcement learning,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 408-423, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.027.
A. Bethencourt-Aguilar, D. Castellanos-Nieves, J. J. Sosa-Alonso, et al., “Use of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in Educational Technology Research,” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 153-170, 2023, doi: 10.7821/naer.2023.1.1231.