A Study on Multilingual Intelligent Dissemination and Adaptive Reconstruction of Cultural Identity of Hezhe Oral History Using Multilingual Large Model Few-shot Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Hezhe people, one of China’s smaller ethnic groups, preserve oral histories that record hunting and fishing culture, historical memory, and the basis of ethnic identity. In an era of globalization and digitalization, the dissemination of Hezhe oral history faces challenges such as limited language carriers, narrow audience reach, and weakened cultural imagery across contexts. For antenna-enabled digital museums, wireless cultural communication platforms, and electromagnetic-media display systems, reliable multilingual semantic encoding is also necessary to preserve cultural meaning during transmission. This study builds a multilingual intelligent dissemination framework for Hezhe oral history based on multilingual large models and Few-shot Learning. Using a parallel corpus of Hezhe, Chinese, English, and Russian, a prompt-based Few-shot translation and generation model is designed. Combined with a cultural specificity classification system and adaptive rewriting strategies, the framework supports high-quality conversion and dissemination of oral history content in multilingual environments. The study further verifies the effectiveness of the framework through quantitative evaluation and qualitative analysis across four dimensions: language quality, cultural fidelity, audience acceptance, and cultural identity impact. The results demonstrate that Few-shot Learning has advantages in low-resource language processing and that multilingual dissemination can support adaptive reconstruction of Hezhe cultural identity, providing a reusable technical path for digital preservation and wireless cultural communication.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
N. D. Pope and M. Ruppel, “Use of Oral History Methods in Social Work: A Scoping Review,” Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 300–317, 2024, doi: 10.1080/26408066.2023.2277809.
F. A. Addanan and A. Abd Aziz, “A Systematic Literature Review of the Oral History Used in Education Settings,” AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 61–74, 2025, doi: 10.37134/ajelp.vol13.1.4.2025.
S. Kawabata, J. L. Womack, and R. Lavalley, “Oral history: A tool to explore community occupation,” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 474–486, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14427591.2025.2501945.
E. H. Brown and M. Beam, “Toward an ethos of trans care in trans oral history,” The Oral History Review, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 29–55, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00940798.2022.2038518.
H. Chen, J. Kim, J. Chen, et al., “Demystifying oral history with natural language processing and data analytics: a case study of the Densho digital collection,” The Electronic Library, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 643–663, 2024, doi: 10.1108/EL-12-2023-0303.
T. Pinotti, M. A. Adler, R. Mermejo, et al., “Picuris Pueblo oral history and genomics reveal continuity in US Southwest,” Nature, vol. 642, no. 8066, pp. 125–132, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08791-9.
J. Mlynáˇr, “How is oral history possible? On linguistically universal and topically specific knowledge,” The Oral History Review, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 116–132, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00940798.2022.2050412.
S. Mendoza Aviña and D. Delgado Bernal, “Exploring radical feminista oral history methodology: implications for educational research and praxis,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1149–1167, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09518398.2025.2502063.
V. Calabria and D. Bailey, “Participatory action research and oral history as natural allies in mental health research,” Qualitative Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 668–685, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14687941211039963.
M. Vrachliotou and C. Papatheodorou, “Interoperability of oral history metadata: an ontological model,” The Oral History Review, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 446–474, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00940798.2024.2379367.
B. M. Reynolds, “What’s so critical about critical oral history?,” The Oral History Review, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 47–69, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00940798.2024.2310467.
J. Joshi and A. D. Hanson, “A pilot oral history of plant synthetic biology,” Plant Physiology, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 36–47, 2024, doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad585.
F. J. García and N. Milanich, “Money Talks: Narrator Compensation in Oral History,” The Oral History Review, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 148–168, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00940798.2023.2230243.
A. S. Boyce, N. R. Bowman, M. E. Hall, et al., “Setting the stage: A selected oral history of culturally responsive evaluation,” New Directions for Evaluation, vol. 2023, no. 180, pp. 15–25, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ev.20578.