Research on Dynamic Risk Assessment Model and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of New Power Market Considering Carbon-Electricity Coupling Risks
Main Article Content
Abstract
Under the ongoing transition toward low-carbon energy systems, power markets are increasingly exposed to complex risks arising from the deep coupling between carbon policies and electricity market operations. As modern smart grids rely on wide-area sensing, electromagnetic information transmission, and intelligent communication infrastructures to support real-time market coordination, accurate dynamic risk assessment has become essential for maintaining secure and resilient system operation. This study proposes a novel assessment framework integrating dynamic risk identification with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to quantify carbon-electricity coupling risks. By introducing a time-varying risk conduction coefficient matrix together with an improved entropy weight-sequence relationship combined weighting method, the proposed framework effectively characterizes dynamic risk evolution while balancing objective data and expert knowledge. A dynamic sliding window mechanism captures temporal variations in risk propagation, and triangular fuzzy numbers are employed to address uncertainty in indicator information. Validation using operational data from seven electricity spot pilot markets in China during 2019–2022 demonstrates that the conduction effect of carbon quota price fluctuations on day-ahead settlement risks increases by an average of 37.8% in regions with high renewable energy penetration. Under extreme weather conditions, East China exhibits a 28.6% probability of simultaneous carbon-cost escalation and power supply shortage risks. Compared with conventional assessment methods, the proposed model extends early warning lead time by 2.3 working days and improves warning accuracy by 11.5 percentage points. The proposed framework provides effective decision support for power market participants while offering a scalable methodology for intelligent risk monitoring and coordinated energy management over smart grid communication and electromagnetic information transmission infrastructures.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
D. Furio and J. Moreno-Del-Castillo, “Dynamic demand response to electricity prices: Evidence from the Spanish retail market,” Utilities Policy: Strategy, Performance, Regulation, vol. 88, p. 101763, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2024.101763.
P. Beraldi and S. Khodaparasti, “Dynamic Pricing in the Electricity Retail Market: A Stochastic Bi-Level Approach,” in International Conference on Optimization and Decision Science, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-28863-0_12.
N. Naseri, S. Talari, W. Ketter, and J. Collins, “Dynamic retail market tariff design for an electricity aggregator using reinforcement learning,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 212, p. 108560, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108560. Li Z et al.
H. Gao, Y. Liu, Y. Ning, D. Jia, Y. Zhou, G. Lv, et al., “ADE Based Dynamic Weight Load Balancing for High Concurrent Access Electricity Market Technical Support System,” IEEE, pp. 1–5, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICPICS52425.2021.9524258.
C. Wu, D. Zhou, and D. Zha, “The interplay of the carbon market, the tradable green certificate market, and electricity market in South Korea: Dynamic transmission and spillover effects,” Energy & Environment, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 163–184, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0958305x221122932.
W. Yu, A. Li, and S. Jiao, “Study on risk spillover of soybean futures market based on dynamic model averaging,” Scientific Insights and Discoveries Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.59782/sidr.v1i1.50.
P. Wang, D. Fang, and S. Wang, “Optimal dynamic regulation in retail electricity market with consumer feedback and social learning,” Energy Policy, vol. 168, p. 113148, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113148.
I. Sahu, K. S. Paira, P. R. Bhoi, and S. Mohdiwale, “Dynamic Long Short-Term Memory Model for Stock Market Price Forecasting,” Prospects of Science, Technology and Applications, pp. 189–198, 2024, doi: 10.1201/9781003489443-20.
S. Agarwal, S. Chakravarti, O. Ghosh, and G. Chakrabarti, “Dynamic market risk and portfolio choice: Evidence from Indian stock market,” IIMB Management Review, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 240–257, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2023.08.001.
J. Janczura and E. Wojcik, “Dynamic short-term risk management strategies for the choice of electricity market based on probabilistic forecasts of profit and risk measures. The German and the Polish market case study,” Energy Economics, vol. 110, p. 106015, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106015.
B. Suto and D. Divenyi, “Local Electricity Market Design Utilizing Dynamic Network Usage Tariff,” 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2103.10175.
X. Wang, H. Huang, W. Zhao, and X. Yang, “Application of dynamic monitoring system in electricity market environment,” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 12451, no. 000, p. 8, 2022, doi: 10.1117/12.2656016.
H. Ali, F. Aslam, and P. Ferreira, “Modeling Dynamic Multifractal Efficiency of US Electricity Market,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 6145, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14196145.
A. Das, “Gaussian Process Regression with a Hybrid Risk Measure for Dynamic Risk Management in the Electricity Market,” Risks, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 13, 2025, doi: 10.3390/risks13010013.
H. Su, D. Zhu, X. Yang, and L. Mo, “Risk Assessment Model of Electricity Customer Data Based on Dynamic Grid Generation Technology,” Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, pp. 115–121, 2025, doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-2794-3_13.
P. Cheimonidis and K. Rantos, “A Dynamic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Model,” Applied Sciences-Basel, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 2171, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15042171.
S. Taravati, A. A. Kishk, and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Finite-Difference Time-Domain Simulation of Wave Propagation in Space-Time-Varying Media: Derivation of schemes, extended framework, and illustrative examples,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, no. 99, pp. 2–13, 2025, doi: 10.1109/MAP.2025.3555843.
Q. Xia, Y. Li, L. Gao, H. Zhang, and K. Xu, “T-S fuzzy dynamic fault tree analysis based on expert comprehensive assessment,” IET Conference Proceedings, vol. 2024, no. 12, pp. 44–52, 2025, doi: 10.1049/icp.2024.3415.
W. Zhang, X. Jia, J. Liu, S. Zhang, and T. Li, “Dynamic risk assessment and active response strategy of human-robot collaboration based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 88, no. 000, p. 102732, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102732.
X. Wang, S. Jia, H. Zhang, and Z. Zhou, “Gray-Fuzzy Integrated Evaluation based on Methodology Assessment of Carbon Reduction Benefits of Power Grid Project Research,” in Proceedings of 7th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), 15–17 Jun 2024, Chongqing, China. Chongqing, China: IEEE and Chongqing Global Union Academy of Science and Technology, 2024, pp. 322–329, doi: 10.1109/itnec60942.2024.10733213.
J. Yao, L. Wang, S. Guo, and H. Qi, “Comprehensive Evaluation of Screw Extruders Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment,” Plastics Science & Technology / Suliao Ke-Ji, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2025, doi: 10.15925/j.cnki.issn1005-3360.2025.02.029.
X. Chen, C. Wang, X. Chen, and X. Gao, “Research on Low-Carbon Assessment Model of Substation,” in International Conference of Electrical, Electronic and Networked Energy Systems, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2025, doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-1868-2_21.