Legal Regulatory Dilemma and Theoretical Breakthrough of Social Collaborative Governance - Based on the Perspective of Multi-Agent Interaction
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper addresses the collaborative-governance deficit caused by unclear stakeholder responsibilities and disordered interactions in complex public governance scenarios. From the perspective of multi-agent interaction, it constructs a three-dimensional “stakeholder-behavior-responsibility” analytical framework. Evolutionary game models are used to simulate strategic interaction processes, social network analysis is used to describe structural relationship characteristics, and scenario simulation experiments are used to observe behavioral performance. Through the integrated analysis of strategy, structure, and behavior, the study decodes the formation mechanism and regulatory path of collaborative governance dilemmas. The results show that clear and coordinated incentive-punishment rules can increase stable cooperation probability to 92.7%, a multi-center information transmission model can improve regulatory penetration efficiency by approximately 44.5%, and a detailed procedural rule framework can shorten task completion time by about 34.0%. The study verifies that a composite research method based on interaction perspective can effectively diagnose governance gaps and optimize institutional design for substantive rule-of-law collaboration.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
N. K. Singh and P. Kumar, “Analysing Social Entrepreneurship’s Legal and Regulatory Frameworks Using Collaborative Innovation,” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. e1188, 2023, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1188.
H. Wang and B. Ran, “Network governance and collaborative governance: A thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements,” Public management review, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1187-1211, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389.
T. Birkstedt, M. Minkkinen, A. Tandon, and M. Mäntymäki, “AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas,” Internet Research, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 133-167, 2023, doi: 10.1108/intr-01-2022-0042.
D. Gritsenko and M. Wood, “Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach,” Regulation & Governance, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45-62, 2022, doi: 10.1111/rego.12367.
F. Lumineau, W. Wang, and O. Schilke, “Blockchain governance—A new way of organizing collaborations?,” Organization Science, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 500-521, 2021, doi: 10.1287/orsc.2020.1379.
A. Taeihagh, “Governance of artificial intelligence,” Policy and society, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 137-157, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377.
A. V. Wirba, “Corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of government in promoting CSR,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 7428-7454, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01185-0.
B. Gu, F. Chen, and K. Zhang, “The policy effect of green finance in promoting industrial transformation and upgrading efficiency in China: analysis from the perspective of government regulation and public environmental demands,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 28, no. 34, pp. 47474-47491, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13944-0.
B. Kiss, F. Sekulova, K. Hörschelmann, C. F.Salk, W. Takahashi, and C. Wamsler, “Citizen participation in the governance of nature-based solutions,” Environmental Policy and Governance, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 247-272, 2022, doi: 10.1002/eet.1987.
J. Torfing, E. Ferlie, T. Juki´c, and E. Ongaro, “A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value,” Policy & Politics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 189-209, 2021, doi: 10.1332/030557321X16108172803520.
S. Bussu, A. Bua, R. Dean, and G. Smith, “Introduction: Embedding participatory governance,” Critical Policy Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 133-145, 2022, doi: 10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179.