Digital Technology Empowers Modern Chinese Literature Research: An Analysis of Thematic Evolution in Classic Works Based on Text Mining
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the rapid development of digital humanities, traditional research on modern Chinese literature is constrained by limited samples and subjective interpretation, while text mining provides a quantitative and systematic analytical approach. This study takes 60 classic works of modern Chinese literature across three historical periods, namely 1919- 1949, 1949-1978, and 1978 to the present, as research objects and constructs an integrated text-mining framework covering data preprocessing, LDA topic modeling, and visual analytics. By combining computational analysis with traditional literary criticism, the study conducts an empirical investigation of cross-period thematic evolution. Eight core themes, including family-nation sentiment, human-nature exploration, and revolutionary narrative, are identified, and their evolutionary trajectories are systematically mapped. The results show that social-historical context, shifts in literary movements, and changes in authors’ creative orientations are the main driving forces behind thematic transformation. The findings demonstrate that text mining can objectively and dynamically represent thematic evolution in modern Chinese literature. The study further argues that complementary integration of computational methods and humanistic inquiry is an important path for literary research in the digital age.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
M. Meng, Z. Li, Z. Jiang, and Y. Cai, “The innovative development of humanities and social sciences in the digital age,” World Social Sciences, no. 6, pp. 31-67, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ssaj.ajcass.com/Magazine/show/?id=90243.
C. Schöch, “Big? smart? clean? messy? data in the humanities,” Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 2-13, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-00920254v1.
Q. Yin and J. Zeng, “Form and meaning: a possible textual analysis theory from the perspective of digital humanities,” Shandong Social Sciences, no. 11, pp. 69-77, 2021, doi: 10.14112/j.cnki.37-1053/c.2021.11.011.
J. Chen, “Exploration of the path for reinterpreting classic modern Chinese literature,” Jiaying Literature, no. 24, pp. 16-19, 2024.
Y. Chen, “The application of artificial intelligence technology in literary research,” Journal of Dialectics of Nature, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 93-99, 2025, doi: 10.15994/j.1000-0763.2025.08.010.
M. Gu, “On the significance of Chinese literature to world literature — centered on Lu Xun’s literary creation,” Social Sciences in China, no. 8, pp. 183-193, 282, 2025.
D. Zhao, “Thematic evolution of “wife-selling” theme works in modern Chinese literature,” Journal of Shantou University (Humanities & Social Sciences Edition), vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 40-45, 96, 2015.
W. Zheng, “Pluralistic and turbulent modern Chinese literature — (III) Nationalist literature,” Journal of Jiamusi University (Social Sciences Edition), vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 68-70, 2010.
J. Wang and Z. Li, “The production mechanism and canonization of modern Chinese literature texts — an investigation based on the novel Camel Xiangzi,” Shandong Social Sciences, no. 10, pp. 62-70, 2025, doi: 10.14112/j.cnki.37-1053/c.2025.10.006.
A. Peris, E. Meijers, and M. van Ham, “The evolution of the systems of cities literature since 1995: Schools of thought and their interaction,” Networks and Spatial Economics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 533-554, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11067-018-9410-5.
D. Skorinkin and A. Bonch-Osmolovskaya, “Text mining War and Peace: Automatic extraction of character traits from literary pieces,” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 32, no. suppl_1, pp. i17-i24, 2017, doi: 10.1093/llc/fqw052.
L. Wei and J. Lu, “Parsing Korean Classical Literature by Integrating Text Mining and Semantic Analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.2478/AMNS-2025-0517.
X. Zhang, “Comparing the Performance Characteristics and Commonalities of Chinese Modern and Contemporary Literature in Different Cultural Contexts by Combining Text Mining Techniques,” Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.2478/AMNS.2023.2.00701.
D. Waegel, “The Development of Text-Mining Tools and Algorithms,” Collegeville, PA, USA: Ursinus College; 2006.
F. Shao, “Research on the Mechanism of Knowledge Discovery in Emerging Technology Fields Based on Text Mining Methods [dissertation],” Tianjin, China: Tianjin Polytechnic University; 2025.
X. Wang, “Research on the Rewriting and Canonization of Famous Literary Works Since 1949 [dissertation],” Kunming, China: Yunnan University; 2023, doi: 10.27456/d.cnki.gyndu.2023.000006.
C. Xia, “The theoretical evolution and paradigm shift of digital humanities: From “digital methods in humanistic research” to “humanistic research in the post-digital age”,” Journal of Library Science in China, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 83-101, 2024, doi: 10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.2024040.
X. Niu, “Modern criticism: The transformation of the “criticism” paradigm, the variation of “close text reading” and its possibilities — A review of Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History and a discussion on current Chinese literary criticism,” Beijing Literary Review.