Personalized Vocabulary Memory Curve Optimization Model Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Stable vocabulary retention is essential in university English learning, but individual cognitive differences often produce unstable memory curves. This paper proposes a personalized memory optimization model based on deep reinforcement learning to construct adaptive review strategies. An LSTM network encodes time-series behavioral data, including accuracy, reaction time, and review time, into a 128-dimensional latent state vector that captures dynamic memory characteristics. Memory strength is mapped into a four-level discrete state space, including newly learned, weakened, consolidation, and stable states, while five optional review timings form the action space. Proximal Policy Optimization learns the optimal review policy by optimizing a reward function that balances retention gain against learning-load penalty. The closed-loop process continuously incorporates learning feedback. Experiments show the highest accuracy of 89.2%–93.1% with low review frequency of 4.3–5.8 times. Long-term retention is also improved, with the average vocabulary retention rate on day 60 not lower than 78.3% and the average memory fluctuation coefficient not higher than 0.18. The proposed method alleviates retention instability caused by cognitive differences and variable learning pace, providing a personalized sequential-decision framework for adaptive learning systems.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Y. Fu, L. Zhang, S. Zhao, et al., “Perceptions of non-English major college students on learning English vocabulary with gamified apps,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 268-276, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i18.24125.
R. Al-Jarf, “Learning vocabulary in the app store by EFL college students,” Online Submission, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 216-225, 2022, doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i1-30.
Z. Pi, Q. Yu, Y. Zhang, et al., “Presenting points or rank: The impacts of leaderboard elements on English vocabulary learning through video lectures,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 104-117, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12871.
R. Gao, “The vocabulary teaching mode based on the theory of constructivism,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 442-446, 2021, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1104.14.
R. Al-Jarf, “Online vocabulary tasks for engaging and motivating EFL college students in distance learning during the pandemic and post-pandemic,” International Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14-24, 2022, doi: 10.32996/ijels.2022.4.1.2.
J. Damanik I and V. Katemba C, “Netflix as a digital EFL learning aid for vocabulary improvement: College students’ perspective,” ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 442-455, 2021.
X. Li, “Investigating innovative approaches to intelligent English classroom teaching for medical and health profession specialization,” Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 53-60, 2023.
J. Murre J M and G. Chessa A, “Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance,” Psychonomic bulletin & review, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 303-307, 2023, doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02172-3.
M. Piotrowski, “Utrwalanie w nauczaniu historii przy pomocy algorytmu SuperMemo i jemu podobnych-propozycja metody redagowania treści historycznych,” Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja, vol. (2), pp. 259-273, 2022, doi: 10.14746/kse.2022.22.15.