Integration and Optimization of Communication Data Security Transmission Mechanisms and Models in Power Consumption Verification

Main Article Content

J. F. Qiao
Y. Li
S. G. Hu
B. Zhang
J. H. Liu

Abstract

The rapid expansion of smart metering infrastructure has escalated the demand for secure and energy-efficient power consumption verification. Traditional verification protocols often suffer from immense communication overheads and high energy requirements, particularly at scale, making them vulnerable to interception and data alteration. This challenge is directly analogous to the textile industry’s imperative for efficient and highly secure auditing of material and energy usage within global supply chains, given that traditional monitoring protocols are typically characterized by high latency, significant resource overhead, and vulnerability to data fraud or tampering. The paper proposes a composite security method for smart grid data transmission, combining lightweight authentication, homomorphic data aggregation, and energy-aware routing with an optimized verification model for consumption auditing. It employs Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) for mutual authentication, Paillier homomorphic encryption for secure data aggregation, and a dynamic routing algorithm for low energy transmission. Experiments on a simulated Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) network demonstrated that the Hybrid scheme, compared to pure Homomorphic Encryption (HE), reduced energy consumption by 42% while maintaining a competitive True Positive Rate (TPR) of 95.7% and significantly lower latency of ~150 ms. These results demonstrate an effective trade-off among security, integrity, and system durability using energy-conscious communication. This dual focus is highly applicable to the textile industry, providing a foundational technical approach for securely and efficiently auditing the complex energy consumption and material usage data across large-scale, automated manufacturing facilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Qiao, J. F., Li, Y., Hu, S. G., Zhang, B., & Liu, J. H. (2026). Integration and Optimization of Communication Data Security Transmission Mechanisms and Models in Power Consumption Verification. Advanced Electromagnetics, 15(3), 4418–4431. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.3515
Section
Research Articles

References

S. I. Nilima, M. K. Bhuyan, and M. Kamruzzaman, “Optimizing resource management for IoT devices in constrained environments,” Journal of Computer and Communications, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 81-98, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=135405

View Article

H. Fan, Y. Liu, and Z. Zeng, “Decentralized privacy-preserving data aggregation scheme for smart grid based on blockchain,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 5282, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20185282.

View Article

P. Singh, M. Masud, and M. S. Hossain, “Blockchain and homomorphic encryption-based privacypreserving data aggregation model in smart grid,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 93, Art. no. 107209, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107209.

View Article

A. A. Khan, V. Kumar, and R. Prasad, “SGAK: A Robust ECC-Based Authenticated Key Exchange Protocol for Smart Grid Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 195745-195759, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10613397.

View Article

M. Korki, J. Jin, and Y. C. Tian, “Real-time cyber-physical systems: State-of-the-art and future trends,” In Handbook of Real-Time Computing. Springer, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-981-4585-87-3_37-1.

View Article

C. M. Chen, L. Chen, and Y. Huang, “Lightweight authentication protocol in edge-based smart grid environment,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 68, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13638-021-01930-6.

View Article

M. Mahamat, G. Jaber, and A. Bouabdallah, “Achieving efficient energy-aware security in IoT networks: A survey of recent solutions and research challenges,” Wireless networks, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 787-808, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11276-022-03170-y.

View Article

L. Wu, S. Fu, and Y. Luo, “A robust and lightweight privacy-preserving data aggregation scheme for smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 270-283, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10059208.

View Article

T. V. T. Doan, M. L. Messai, and G. Gavin, “A survey on implementations of homomorphic encryption schemes,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 79, no. 13, pp. 15098-15139, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11227-023-05233-z.

View Article

A. Mohammadali and M. S. Haghighi, “A privacy-preserving homomorphic scheme with multiple dimensions and fault tolerance for metering data aggregation in smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 5212-5220, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9313012.

View Article

Z. Abreu and L. Pereira, “Privacy protection in smart meters using homomorphic encryption: An overview,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. e1469, 2022, doi: 10.1002/widm.1469.

View Article

K. Yesodha, M. Krishnamurthy, and K. Thangaramya, “Elliptic curve encryption-based energyefficient secured ACO routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 80, no. 13, pp. 18866-18899, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11227-024-06235-1

View Article

D. K. Bangotra, Y. Singh, and A. Selwal, “A trust based secure intelligent opportunistic routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 1045-1066, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08564-3.

View Article

S. Kumar, H. Banka, and B. Kaushik, “A review and analysis of secure and lightweight ECC-based RFID authentication protocol for Internet of Vehicles,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. e4354, 2021, doi: 10.1002/ett.4354.

View Article

M. F. Guato Burgos, J. Morato, and F. P. Vizcaino Imacaña, “A review of smart grid anomaly detection approaches pertaining to artificial intelligence,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1194, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14031194.

View Article

M. Wen, R. Xie, and K. Lu, “FedDetect: A novel privacy-preserving federated learning framework for energy theft detection in smart grid,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 6069-6080, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9531953.

View Article

J. H. Oh, S. J. Yu, and J. Y. Lee, “A secure and lightweight authentication protocol for IoT-based smart homes,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1488, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21041488.

View Article

C. Wang, P. Huo, and M. Ma, “A provable secure and lightweight ECC-based authenticated key agreement scheme for edge computing infrastructure in smart grid,” Computing, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 2511-2537, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00607-023-01188-4.

View Article

W. Xu, J. Sun, and R. Cardell-Oliver, “A privacy-preserving framework using homomorphic encryption for smart metering systems,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 4746, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23104746.

View Article

A. Celik, I. Romdhane, and G. Kaddoum, “A top-down survey on optical wireless communications for the internet of things,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1-45, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9941340.

View Article

D. Dhabliya, R. Soundararajan, and P. Selvarasu, “Energy-efficient network protocols and resilient data transmission schemes for wireless sensor Networks—An experimental survey,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 8883, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15238883.

View Article

A. G. Laurian, F. Emmanuel, and E. M. Nadia, “Faster beta Weil pairing on BLS pairing friendly curves with odd embedding degree,” Mathematics in Computer Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 13, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11786-022-00531-w.

View Article

P. Kairouz and H. B. McMahan, “Advances and open problems in federated learning,” Foundations and trends in machine learning, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 1-210, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/MAL-083.

View Article

H. DYMOVA, “Study of Cryptographic Security of Computer Networks,” COMPUTER-INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES: EDUCATION, SCIENCE, PRODUCTION, vol. (57), pp. 15-19, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://cit.lntu.edu.ua/index.php/cit/article/view/656

View Article

M. Faisal, J. Zhang, J. Liagouris, V. Kalavri, and M. Varia, “{TVA}: A multi-party computation system for secure and expressive time series analytics,” in 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23), 2023 Aug, Anaheim, CA, USA. USA: USENIX Association, 2023, pp. 5395-5412, [Online]. Available: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity23/presentation/faisal.

View Article

I. Keshta, “A CRC-Based authentication model and ECC-Based authentication protocol for Resource-Constrained IoT applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 156765-156784, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10720777.

View Article

S. Chaliasos, J. Ernstberger, D. Theodore, D. Wong, M. Jahanara, and B. Livshits, “{SoK}: What Don’t We Know? Understanding Security Vulnerabilities in {SNARKs},” in 33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 24), 2024 Aug, Philadelphia, PA, USA. USA: USENIX Association, 2024, pp. 3855-3872, [Online]. Available: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity24/presentation/chaliasos.

View Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.