Improving the English Translation Quality of Chinese Silk Cultural Terms Using Prompt Tuning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Accurate translation of domain-specific terminology is essential for preserving technical semantics and enabling reliable international knowledge exchange in engineering disciplines, including electromagnetic waves, antennas, and propagation, where standardized descriptions and interdisciplinary communication are increasingly important. To address semantic collapse and cultural information loss in the English translation of Chinese silk cultural terms, this study proposes a prompt tuning framework incorporating a cultural parameter decoupling mechanism. A gated attention strategy is introduced to separate cultural features from underlying semantic representations, while a three-dimensional dynamic prompt template and a hierarchical knowledge correction mechanism are developed to preserve historical symbolism, craft characteristics, and customary functions during translation. Experiments conducted on 12,800 Chinese–English parallel corpora demonstrate that the proposed method reduces the cultural mistranslation rate to 6.1% while achieving high robustness against spelling errors, dialect interference, abbreviation ambiguity, and symbol omission. Compared with conventional neural machine translation models, the framework exhibits superior terminology accuracy and cultural semantic fidelity through coordinated optimization of parameter decoupling and knowledge-guided correction. Beyond silk cultural translation, the proposed methodology provides a transferable strategy for preserving specialized semantic information in technical documentation and multilingual knowledge systems, offering potential reference for cross-domain terminology management and intelligent engineering information processing.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
N. Dassanayake, “Exploring Coherence among Sri Lankan CFL Learners in Chinese-English Translation: Decoding and Interpreting of Culture-loaded Content,” International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 350-363, 2022, doi: 10.36892/ijlls.v4i1.868.
D. Liu and Y. Qin, “A Study of English Translation of Culture-Loaded Words Based on The Mountain Whisperer,” Open Access Library Journal, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1-14, 2024, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1112701.
O. E. Lau, M. Amini, C. S. Siau, and D. A. L. Tan, “Translation of Chinese culture specific items to English in the film Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon,” AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 68-81, 2022, doi: 10.37134/ajelp.vol10.2.5.2022.
Sitender and S. Bawa, “A Sanskrit-to-English machine translation using hybridization of direct and rule-based approach,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 2819-2838, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05156-3.
N. Koul and S. S. Manvi, “A proposed model for neural machine translation of Sanskrit into English,” International Journal of Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 375-381, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s41870-019-00340-8.
M. Singh, R. Kumar, and I. Chana, “Machine translation systems for Indian languages: Review of modelling techniques, challenges, open issues and future research directions,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2165-2193, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11831-020-09449-7.
W. Hong and C. Rossi, “The cognitive turn in metaphor translation studies: A critical overview,” Journal of Translation Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 83– 115, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-03342406v1.
O. Vakhovska, “Subjectivity in metaphor translation: A case for Russian translation of English metaphors of depressive emotions,” Cognition, Communication, Discourse, vol. (23), pp. 99-117, 2021, doi: 10.26565/2218-2926-2021-23-07.
X. Si and J. Wang, “Grammatical metaphor in English-Chinese translation,” International Journal of Translation, Interpretation, and Applied Linguistics (IJTIAL), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15-29, 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJTIAL.20210101.oa2.
L. Jiayi, “A Study on the Foreign Publicity Translation of Chinese Silk Culture from the Perspective of Linguistic Adaptation Theory–A Case Study of CE Translation of Exhibits in China National Silk Museum,” International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 27-35, 2025, doi: 10.22161/IJELS.105.7.
Y. Wang, “Artificial intelligence technologies in college English translation teaching,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1525-1544, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09960-5.
A. Fan, S. Bhosale, H. Schwenk, Z. Ma, A. El-Kishky, S. Goyal, et al., “Beyond english-centric multilingual machine translation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 22, no. 107, pp. 1-48, 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.11125.
J. Šrol, “Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs: The role of analytic thinking and susceptibility to cognitive biases,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 125-162, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13546783.2021.1938220.
J. Altarriba and D. Basnight-Brown, “The psychology of communication: The interplay between language and culture through time,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 53, no. 7-8, pp. 860-874, 2022, doi: 10.1177/00220221221114046.
C. H. Trisos, J. Auerbach, and M. Katti, “Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology,” Nature Ecology & Evolution, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1205-1212, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01460-w.
T. Lomas, “Towards a cross-cultural lexical map of wellbeing,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 622-639, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17439760.2020.1791944.
D. Stringer, “Folkbiology in endangered languages: Cognitive universals and lexical relativity,” Sociolinguistic Studies, vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 357-376, 2024, doi: 10.3138/ss-18-3.4-0003.
E. Sidorova and J. Ferguson, “Lost in translation: Overcoming distinctions in worldviews in environmental impact assessments in Canada and Russia,” The International Indigenous Policy Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1-31, 2023, doi: 10.18584/iipj.2023.14.2.14942.
E. C. Chinemerem, Y. M. Kayode, S. F. Ayegba, and T. M. Abdulmusawir, “A System for Machine Translation from English to Ebira using the Rule-based Approach,” Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 137-148, 2021, doi: 10.9734/jsrr/2021/v27i1130465.
S. Mahalingam, Y. Venkatraman, and P. Boominathan, “Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V): A systematic review,” Journal of Voice, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 630-640, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.10.022.
C. S. Devi and B. S. Purkayastha, “An empirical analysis on statistical and neural machine translation system for English to Mizo language,” International Journal of Information Technology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 4021-4028, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s41870-023-01488-0.
O. Asscher and E. Glikson, “Human evaluations of machine translation in an ethically charged situation,” New Media & Society, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1087-1107, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14614448211018833.
W. Hu, W. Lin, Q. Li, X. Yu, and C. Zhu, “Textile AI-Enhanced Translation System Based on Mapping Probability and In-context Learning,” ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1-17, 2025, doi: 10.1145/3746227.
F. S. Cohen, Z. Zhong, and C. Li, “Semantic graph for word disambiguation in machine translation,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 81, no. 30, pp. 43485-43502, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13242-y.
N. Mirzakhodjaev and O. Yuldasheva, “MACHINE TRANSLATION VS HUMAN TRANSLATION: EVALUATING ACCURACY AND EFFECTIVENESS,” Obshectvennye nayki v covremennom mire: teoreticheckie i prakticheckie iccledovaniya, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 15-24, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/zdif/article/view/80812.
J. M. De Martino, I. R. Silva, J. G. T. Marques, A. C. Martins, E. T. Poeta, D. S. Christinele, et al., “Neural machine translation from text to sign language,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 37-50, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10209-023-01018-6.
K. Zhao, “English grammar correction based on attention mechanism machine translation,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Studies, vol. 13, no. 1-2, pp. 78-94, 2024, doi: 10.1504/IJCISTUDIES.2024.144049.
B. Klimova, M. Pikhart, A. D. Benites, C. Lehr, and C. Sanchez-Stockhammer, “Neural machine translation in foreign language teaching and learning: A systematic review,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 663-682, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11194-2.
S. Lo, “Neural machine translation in EFL classrooms: Learners’ vocabulary improvement, immediate vocabulary retention and delayed vocabulary retention,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 592-611, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2023.2207603.
S. Ranathunga, E. S. A. Lee, M. Prifti Skenduli, R. Shekhar, M. Alam, and R. Kaur, “Neural machine translation for lowresource languages: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1-37, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3567592.
M. Li, “Study of the Translation Strategies for the Chinese Culture-loaded Words in Peking Opera under Functional Equivalence Theory,” Advances in Broadcasting, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 22-34, 2022, doi: 10.23977/abroa.2022.020103.
Y. Wang, Y. Wang, K. Dang, J. Liu, and Z. Liu, “A comprehensive survey of grammatical error correction,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1-51, 2021, doi: /abs/10.1145/3474840.
A. A. Pratama, T. B. L. Ramadhan, F. N. Elawati, and R. A. Nugroho, “Translation quality analysis of cultural words in translated tourism promotional text of Central Java,” Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 179-193. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i1.515, 2021.
Z. Tektigul, A. Bayadilova-Altybayev, S. Sadykova, S. Iskindirova, A. Kushkimbayeva, and D. Zhumagul, “Language is a symbol system that carries culture,” International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 203-214, 2023, doi: 10.22034/ijscl.2022.562756.2781. Y. Zeng