Innovation and Optimization of Ideological and Political Education Content and Path in Universities from the Perspective of Political Economy Theory
Main Article Content
Abstract
Under the dual mission of ideological construction and moral education, university ideological and political programs face structural difficulties, including the disconnection between theoretical content and engineering-oriented digital transformation, the solidification of educational paths, and weak practical application. These challenges hinder the cultivation of social responsibility and professional integrity among students entering technology-intensive fields such as intelligent manufacturing, information engineering, and communication systems. Political economy, as an important component of Marxist theory, provides a scientific tool for analyzing social contradictions and grasping the essence of the times through its standpoint, viewpoints, and methods. This theoretical orientation is compatible with the core goals of ideological and political education, which emphasize distinguishing right from wrong, maintaining a firm value stance, and guiding practical decision-making. By introducing political-economy analysis into curriculum content and teaching paths, ideological and political education can better connect theoretical interpretation with real industrial innovation, social responsibility, and ethical governance in technical contexts. The study therefore argues that content innovation and path optimization from the perspective of political economy can improve the targeted supply and practical effectiveness of ideological and political education in universities, especially for students whose future work will be embedded in complex engineering and digital systems.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
P. W. Oviedo, C. J. Guijarro, and P. K. Venegas, “Corruption, unemployment, and clientelism: A Political Economy approach,” Economic Modelling, vol. 135, Art. no. 106723, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106723.
R. W. Mgomezulu, M. M. Chitete, B. B. Maonga, et al., “Agricultural subsidies in a political economy: Can collective action make smallholder agriculture contribute to development? Research in Globalization,” 2024; 8:100212, DOI: 10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100212.
F. A. Okoh, A. Owusu, A. Mohammed, et al., “Correction to: Investigating the purposefulness of development planning in Ghana through a political economy lens,” SN Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, 2024, DOI: 10.1007/s43545-024-00877-x.
E. Nina, “A Political Economy of Fiscal Space: Political Structures, Bond Markets, and Monetary Accommodation of Government Spending Potential in the Core and Periphery,” Review of Political Economy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 546-564, 2024, DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2023.2178843.
Q. Jalal and S. Malcolm, “‘Independence’ of Central Banks and the Political Economy of Monetary Policy,” Review of Political Economy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 565-580, 2024, DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2023.2189006.
C. Chao, “Old Age but No Rest: The Political Economy of Delayed Retirement,” Monthly Review, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 25-32, 2024, DOI: 10.14452/MR-075-11-2024-04_3.
J. T. Hatton, “The political economy of assisted immigration: Australia 1860-1913,” Explorations in Economic History, vol. 92, Art. no. 101565, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2023.101565.
J. Keith, A. Rowland, and W. Deborah, “Political economy perspectives and their relevance for contemporary housing studies,” Housing Studies, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 962-979, 2024, DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2100327.
D. O. Groote, A. Gautier, and F. Verboven, “The political economy of financing climate policy - Evidence from the solar PV subsidy programs,” Resource and Energy Economics, vol. 77, Art. no. 101436, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2024.101436.
E. S. Ghoul, O. Guedhami, and R. Jamshed, “Global perspectives on corporate social responsibility, political institutions, and the political economy,” Global Finance Journal, vol. 60, Art. no. 100936, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100936.
F. Obeng-Odoom, “Global migration beyond limits: ecology economics and political economy,” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 306 pp., £71.00 (hbk), ISBN: 9780198867180. Research in Globalization, pp. 8, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100204.
J. Shaw and W. Glover, “The Political Economy of Digital Health Equity: Structural Analysis,” Journal of medical Internet research, vol. 26, Art. no. e46971, 2024, DOI: 10.2196/46971.
B. Larissa, “The Political Economy of Climate Change Mitigation in Argentina, Brazil and Peru,” Iberoamericana - Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2024, DOI: 10.16993/iberoamericana.614.
V. Espinosa and D. Cueva, “The political economy of fiscal dominance: Evidence from the Chilean government of Salvador Allende,” Economic Affairs, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 118-138, 2024, DOI: 10.1111/ecaf.12618.
C. Ivano and S. Roberto, “Political economy revisited: structures and objectives at the systemic level,” Economia Politica, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 153-171, 2024, DOI: 10.1007/s40888-024-00331-4.
A. O. Festus, A. Owusu, A. Mohammed, et al., “Investigating the purposefulness of development planning in Ghana through a political economy lens,” SN Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, 2024, DOI: 10.1007/s43545-024-00866-0.
L. Feixia, “The importance of the English language for the early Engels-a comparison between Engels’ and Marx’s research on English political economic literature before their collaboration,” New Political Economy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 260-272, 2024, DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2023.2242272.
F. Nicholas, A. Megan, and F. Sharon, “Shaping planetary health inequities: the political economy of the Australian growth model,” New Political Economy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 273-287, 2024, DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2023.2242796.
L. Weijie, “Demography and the composition of taxes: a political economy theory,” Policy Studies, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 223-240, 2024, DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2202905.
M. Vidal, “From Labour Process Theory to Organisational Political Economy: A Response to Benassi, Ikeler and Wood,” Critical Sociology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 351-366, 2024, DOI: 10.1177/08969205231219209.