Incremental vs. Stock: Evaluating the Impact of VAT Credit Refunds on Corporate Productivity with Evidence from Difference-in-Differences and Machine Learning Heterogeneity Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper re-examines the effects of incremental and stock value-added tax (VAT) credit refunds on enterprise total factor productivity (TFP). Based on updated panel data from Shanghai and Shenzhen listed companies covering both the incremental-refund window and the stock-refund window, a difference-in-differences (DID) model is used to identify average productivity effects. The results show that both refund policies significantly improve corporate TFP, and the updated estimates support the interpretation that tax refunds operate through R&D investment, financing constraints, productive investment, and firm-level absorptive capacity. The effects vary across regions and firms: fiscal pressure, marketization, profitability, growth, ownership, and innovation-related capacity help explain heterogeneous responses. To connect DID estimates with firm-level heterogeneity, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost models are further applied. Feature-importance and SHAP analyses show that ROA, ownership, growth, leverage, capital expenditure, financing constraints, and intangible assets are key predictors of policy response. The findings provide evidence for precision-oriented fiscal policy and are relevant to capital-intensive advanced manufacturing sectors, including optical communication and electromagnetic equipment industries.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Y. Zhang, Z. Bai, and C. Findlay, “Value-added tax reform and service exports: Evidence from China,” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 551-573, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09638199.2023.2199437.
Y. Li and M. Meng, “Value-Added Tax Retention and Refund, Local Government Subsidies and Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises,” Tax Research, vol. (08), pp. 30-38, 2024, doi: 10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2024.08.007.
G. Shen and B. Chen, “Total Factor Productivity of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises: New Data, New Methods and New Findings,” China Economic Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 04, pp. 1048-1065, 2024, doi: 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2024.04.02.
Y. Liu and J. Mao, “How Do Tax Incentives Affect Investment and Productivity? Firm-Level Evidence from China,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 261-291, 2019, doi: 10.1257/pol.20170478.
Q. Zhou, T. Li, and L. Gong, “The effect of tax incentives on energy intensity: Evidence from China’s VAT reform,” Energy Economics, vol. 108, Art. no. 105887, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105887.
J. Yu and Y. Qi, “BT-to-VAT reform and firm productivity: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in China,” China Economic Review, vol. 71, Art. no. 101740, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101740.
D. Yao, L. Jiang, and F. Wang, “Management Expenses, Transaction Costs and Enterprise Total Factor Productivity—A Quasi-Experimental Study Based on the “Business Tax to VAT” Reform,” World Economy Papers, vol. (02), pp. 36-56, 2022, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-6364.2022.2.sjjjwh202202003.
H. Cui, B. Wang, and W. Wang, “Can Reducing Value-Added Tax Rates Improve Enterprise Total Factor Productivity? Accounting Research,” 2023;(02):133-148, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2023.02.010.
H. Yu, K. Shen, and L. Sun, “Research on the Impact of VAT Reduction on Regional Manufacturing Productivity,” Finance & Trade Research, vol. 34, no. 06, pp. 45-56, 2023, doi: 10.19337/j.cnki.34-1093/f.2023.06.005.
X. Cheng, Z. Liu, and H. Xiu, “Can Value-Added Tax Reduction Improve the Total Factor Productivity of Manufacturing Enterprises? — An Empirical Study Based on the VAT Rate Reduction Event,” Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences), vol. 39, no. 01, pp. 65-77, 2024, doi: 10.12085/j.issn.1009-6116.2024.01.006.
C. Syverson, “What Determines Productivity? Journal of Economic Literature,” 2011;49(2):326-365, doi: 10.1257/jel.49.2.326.
C. Cobb and P. Douglas, “A Theory of Production,” The American Economic Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 139-165, 1928.
S. Nambisan, K. Lyytinen, A. Majchrzak, and M. Song, “Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 223-238, 2017, doi: 10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03.
X. Luo, W. Zhang, and H. Li, “Cloud computing capability: Its technological root and business impact,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 193-213, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10919392.2018.1480926.
C. Du and Y. Xue, “R&D Alliance, Open Innovation and the Improvement of Enterprise Total Factor Productivity,” Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 111-132, 2024, doi: 10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20240926.005.
C. Bravo-Ortega and Á. García, “R&D and Productivity: A Two Way Avenue? World Development,” 2011;39(7):1090-1107, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.11.006.
X. Ke and Z. Xu, “The Impact of Enterprise Digital Technology Innovation on Total Factor Productivity—Based on the Dual Paths of Factor Structure Optimization and Management Efficiency Improvement,” Western Forum, vol. 34, no. 05, pp. 50-64, 2024, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8131.2024.05.004.
Y. Zhou and S. Dahal, “Has R&D contributed to productivity growth in China? The role of basic, applied and experimental R&D,” China Economic Review, vol. 88, Art. no. 102281, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102281.
T. Ren, X. Sun, and X. Chu, “The Impact of Capital Allocation Distortion in Key Industries on China’s Total Factor Productivity,” Economics and Management Research, vol. 41, no. 01, pp. 63-77, 2020, doi: 10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2020.01.005.
W. Wang and Z. Niu, “A Multi-dimensional Study on the Impact of Resource Misallocation on China’s Industrial Total Factor Productivity,” Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, vol. 36, no. 03, pp. 20-37, 2019, doi: 10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2019.03.002.
B. Liu, E. Kou, and L. Yang, “Multi-rate VAT, Resource Misallocation and Total Factor Productivity Loss,” Economic Research Journal, vol. 54, no. 05, pp. 113-128, 2019.
A. Otsuka, “Regional determinants of total factor productivity in Japan: Stochastic frontier analysis,” The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 579-596, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00168-017-0808-7.
X. Chen and W. Xu, “Data Elements, Transportation Infrastructure and Industrial Structure Upgrading—An Analysis Based on a Quantitative Spatial General Equilibrium Model,” Management World, vol. 40, no. 04, pp. 78-98, 2024, doi: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2024.0046.
D. Jorgenson, “Capital Theory and Investment Behavior,” The American Economic Review, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 247-259, 1963.
Y. Liu and C. Geng, “The Impact of Intergovernmental Burden Sharing of Export Tax Rebates on Product Exports,” China Economic Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 03, pp. 1011-1030, 2018, doi: 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2017.02.08.
J. Yu and C. Wan, “VAT Retention and Refund, Financing Constraints and Enterprise Total Factor Productivity,” Fiscal Science, vol. (01), pp. 104-118, 2022, doi: 10.19477/j.cnki.10-1368/f.2022.01.013.
S. Li, Z. Jin, and Y. Xie, “Value-Added Tax Neutrality and Enterprise Total Factor Productivity—A Study Based on the VAT Refund Reform,” Economic Review, vol. (02), pp. 59-74, 2023, doi: 10.19361/j.er.2023.02.05.
X. Li, “The Effect of Value-Added Tax Refunds on the Total Factor Productivity of Manufacturing Enterprises,” Tax Research, vol. (11), pp. 112-117, 2023, doi: 10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2023.11.011.
S. Yue and C. Xiao, “Can VAT Retention and Refund Alleviate Enterprise Financing Constraints? — Empirical Evidence Based on Cash-Cash Flow Sensitivity,” Finance & Trade Economics, vol. 44, no. 01, pp. 51-67, 2023, doi: 10.19795/j.cnki.cn11-1166/f.2023.01.003.
S. Alnahedh, S. Bhagat, and I. Obreja, “Employment, Corporate Investment, and Cash-Flow Risk,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1855-1898, 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0022109019000437.
P. Bacchetta, K. Benhima, and C. Poilly, “Corporate Cash and Employment,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 30-66, 2019, doi: 10.1257/mac.20150191.
P. Wang, Y. Liu, and M. Cui, “Research on the Impact of Value-Added Tax Refund Policy on Enterprise Green Innovation Efficiency,” Tax Research, vol. (08), pp. 39-47, 2024, doi: 10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2024.08.014.
D. Comin and B. Hobijn, “An Exploration of Technology Diffusion,” American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 2031-2059, 2010, doi: 10.1257/aer.100.5.2031.
L. Li, Y. Bao, and J. Liu, “Research on the Impact of Intelligence on China’s Manufacturing Total Factor Productivity,” Studies in Science of Science, vol. 38, no. 04, pp. 609-618+722, 2020, doi: 10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2020.04.006.
J. Levinsohn and A. Petrin, “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 317-341, 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00246.
G. Olley and A. Pakes, “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry,” Econometrica, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1263-1297, 1996, doi: 10.2307/2171831.
Y. Wu, C. Lv, and C. Ni, “Tax Neutrality of VAT, Enterprise Investment and Enterprise Value—A Study Based on the “VAT Refund” Reform,” Management World, vol. 37, no. 08, pp. 180-194, 2021, doi: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0115.
W. Cai, X. Shen, B. Li, et al., “Innovation Incentive Effect of Value-Added Tax Refund Policy,” Financial Studies, vol. (05), pp. 31-48, 2022, doi: 10.19477/j.cnki.11-1077/f.2022.05.005.
D. Zhou, B. Min, and X. Liang, “The Early-life Political Event Experience of the Chair of the Board and the Firm’s Innovation Decision,” Australian Accounting Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 186-212, 2021, doi: 10.1111/auar.12331.
J. Yu, H. Zhao, and C. Zhu, “Tax Reduction Incentives and Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Performance—A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on VAT Retention and Refund,” Contemporary Finance and Economics, vol. (10), pp. 44-57, 2023, doi: 10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.20230906.001.
C. Liu and N. Zhang, “The Incentive Effect of Value-Added Tax Refunds on Enterprise Green Technology Innovation,” Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, vol. (03), pp. 57-69, 2024, doi: 10.19639/j.cnki.issn1003-5230.2024.0029.
J. Mao, J. Cao, and C. Yang, “The Impact of “Business Tax to VAT” Reform on Enterprise Innovation Behavior—Mechanism Analysis and Empirical Test,” Tax Research, vol. (07), pp. 12-19, 2020, doi: 10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2020.07.002.
S. Yang, P. Zhang, and J. You, “Research on the Incentive Effect of Tax Preferences on Enterprise Total Factor Productivity—Based on the Background of Supply-side Structural Reform,” Tax Research, vol. (04), pp. 104-109, 2019, doi: 10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2019.04.021.
B. Sun, “Research on the Reform of Fiscal Burden Sharing Mechanism for VAT Retention and Refund,” Macroeconomic Research, vol. (11), pp. 25-34+47, 2023, doi: 10.16304/j.cnki.11-3952/f.2023.11.002.
M. Huang, L. Yang, and H. Wang, “Construction of a Unified National Market and Carbon Emissions from the Perspective of Market Factors— Empirical Evidence from China’s 15 Major Urban Agglomerations,” Finance Theory & Practice, vol. 46, no. 01, pp. 103-110, 2025, doi: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbcjb.2025.01.013.