Evaluation of the Model of College English Classroom Teaching Effect in the Digital Learning Environment
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital learning environments generate continuous streams of heterogeneous interaction data, creating increasing demands for efficient monitoring, information fusion, and adaptive evaluation. This study proposes a data-driven classroom effectiveness assessment framework by integrating the Plan– Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle with an ant colony optimization algorithm. A multidimensional evaluation architecture is established to characterize classroom vitality, organizational structure, and system resilience through teacher–student interaction data, learning-behavior records, and resource-utilization information. To improve evaluation reliability and optimization efficiency, the ant colony algorithm is employed to perform adaptive indicator-weight adjustment and evaluation-path optimization, while the PDCA mechanism provides a closed-loop feedback process for dynamic system refinement. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework improves the efficiency of multi-source data integration, analysis, and feedback generation by approximately 16% compared with conventional evaluation approaches. Furthermore, the optimized model achieves higher consistency with teacher and student perceptions and exhibits enhanced adaptability in dynamic digital environments. The proposed framework provides an effective methodology for intelligent monitoring, multi-source information fusion, adaptive optimization, and data-driven decision support, offering potential references for networked sensing, information-processing, and intelligent evaluation systems.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
J. Zhang, N. Beckmann, and J. F. Beckmann, “One situation doesn’t fit all: Variability and stability of state willingness to communicate in a Chinese College English classroom,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 504-529, 2022.
K. Y. Chau, K. M. Y. Law, and Y. M. Tang, “Impact of self-directed learning and educational technology readiness on synchronous E-learning,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1-20, 2021.
X. Yang, X. Zhou, and J. Hu, “Students’ preferences for seating arrangements and their engagement in cooperative learning activities in college English blended learning classrooms in higher education,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1356-1371, 2022.
Y. Du, “Study on Cultivating College Students’ English Autonomous Learning Ability under the Flipped Classroom Model,” English Language Teaching, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 13-19, 2020.
L. Yan, “A study on WeChat-based collaborative learning in college English writing,” English Language Teaching, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1-9, 2019.
N. T. Hoang and D. H. Le, “Vocational English teachers’ challenges on shifting towards virtual classroom teaching,” AsiaCALL Online Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 58-73, 2021.
J. Zhang, “The Construction of College English Online Learning Community under ADDIE Model,” English Language Teaching, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 46-51, 2020.
R. J. Kreitzer and J. Sweet-Cushman, “Evaluating student evaluations of teaching: A review of measurement and equity bias in SETs and recommendations for ethical reform,” Journal of Academic Ethics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 73-84, 2022.
J. A. Grissom and B. Bartanen, “Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher ESs,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 514-555, 2019.
L. A. Rodriguez, W. A. Swain, and M. G. Springer, “Sorting through performance evaluations: The influence of performance evaluation reform on teacher attrition and mobility,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 2339-2377, 2020.
F. Mengel, J. Sauermann, and U. Zolitz, “Gender bias in teaching evaluations,” Journal of the European economic association, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 535-566, 2019.
D. D. Liebowitz and L. Porter, “The effect of principal behaviors on student, teacher, and school outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 785-827, 2019.
C. Redding, “A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes,” Review of educational research, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 499-535, 2019.
N. Suryani, “The Effect of DL Material on Students’ Social Skills in Social Studies Learning,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 417-432, 2021.
D. S. Aditya, “Embarking DL Due to COVID-19: Are Teachers Ready?,” Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 104-116, 2021.
M. Korona, “Evaluating Online Information: Attitudes and Practices of Secondary English Language Arts Teachers,” Journal of Media Literacy Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 42-56, 2020.