Integrating Low-Altitude Takeoff and Landing Infrastructure into Smart City Systems

Main Article Content

H. L. Wang

Abstract

Low-altitude mobility is expanding from pilot services to urban-scale deployment, but its physical infrastructure is still planned outside many city data and operations systems. This paper develops and tests an integrated method for embedding takeoff and landing infrastructure into smart city infrastructure. The method combines dynamic UAV acquisition, BIM-based semantic modelling, hierarchical facility coding, a unified BIM/CIM data foundation and multi-agent simulation. It classifies takeoff and landing infrastructure into four functional levels and eight facility types, and maps facility codes to GB/T 51269-2017 and IFC entities to support cross-system data exchange. The method was evaluated in Hefei Luogang Urban Park and Wuhu Wanzhi Low-Altitude Economy Industrial Park, covering 16 takeoff and landing facilities and 64 related urban elements. In the integrated scheme, the mean transfer distance between landing facilities and transport hubs decreased by about 35%, cross-department work-order processing time decreased by 60.7%, and the Comprehensive Synergy Index increased from 0.78 to 0.85. These results indicate that BIM/CIM-centred integration can improve spatial coordination, data sharing and operational management for low-altitude urban infrastructure. Further validation is still needed under real wind conditions and in larger metropolitan settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wang, H. L. (2026). Integrating Low-Altitude Takeoff and Landing Infrastructure into Smart City Systems. Advanced Electromagnetics, 15(3), 11143–11150. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.4324
Section
Research Articles

References

A. Kasliwal et al., “Role of flying cars in sustainable mobility,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 1555, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09426-0.

View Article

A. Straubinger, R. Rothfeld, M. Shamiyeh, K. D. Buchter, K. O. Kaiser, and M. Hornung, “An overview of current research and developments in urban air mobility: Setting the scene for UAM introduction,” J. Air Transp. Manage., vol. 87, Art. no. 101852, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020. 101852.

A. P. Cohen, S. A. Shaheen, and E. M. Farrar, “Urban air mobility: History, ecosystem, market potential, and challenges,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 6074–6087, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3082 767.

L. A. Garrow, B. J. German, and C. E. Leonard, “Urban air mobility: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis with autonomous and electric ground transportation for informing future research,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 132, Art. no. 103377, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103377.

View Article

K. Schweiger and L. Preis, “Urban air mobility: Systematic review of scientific publications and regulations for vertiport design and operations,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 7, Art. no. 179, 2022, doi: 10.3390/drones6070179.

View Article

L. Preis and M. Hornung, “A vertiport design heuristic to ensure efficient ground operations for urban air mobility,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 14, Art. no. 7260, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12147260.

View Article

R. Volk, J. Stengel, and F. Schultmann, “Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings: Literature review and future needs,” Autom. Constr., vol. 38, pp. 109–127, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023.

View Article

C. Boje, A. Guerriero, S. Kubicki, and Y. Rezgui, “Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research,” Autom. Constr., vol. 114, Art. no. 103179, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179.

View Article

A. Fuller, Z. Fan, C. Day, and C. Barlow, “Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 108952– 108971, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358.

View Article

G. Groger and L. Plumer, “CityGML: Interoperable semantic 3D city models,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 71, pp. 12–33, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.04.004.

View Article

F. Leite, A. Akcamete, B. Akinci, G. Atasoy, and S. Kiziltas, “Analysis of modeling effort and impact of different levels of detail in building information models,” Autom. Constr., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 601–609, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.027.

View Article

H. Wang, Y. Pan, and X. Luo, “Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: A review and bibliometric analysis,” Autom. Constr., vol. 103, pp. 41–52, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.005.

View Article

D. Shkundalov and T. Vilutiene, “Bibliometric analysis of Building Information Modeling, Geographic Information Systems and Web environment integration,” Autom. Constr., vol. 128, Art. no. 103757, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103757.

View Article

R. Volk, T. H. Luu, J. S. Mueller-Roemer, N. Sevilmis, and F. Schultmann, “Deconstruction project planning of existing buildings based on automated acquisition and reconstruction of building information,” Autom. Constr., vol. 91, pp. 226–245, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.017.

View Article

T. Xia, J. Yang, and L. Chen, “Automated semantic segmentation of bridge point cloud based on local descriptor and machine learning,” Autom. Constr., vol. 133, Art. no. 103992, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103992.

View Article

X. Yang, L. Deng, and P. Wei, “Multi-agent autonomous on-demand free flight operations in urban air mobility,” in Proc. AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, TX, USA, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.2514/6.2019-3520.

View Article

Q. Zhou and G. Liu, “UAV path planning based on the combination of A-star algorithm and RRT-star algorithm,” in Proc. 2022 IEEE Int. Conf. Unmanned Syst. (ICUS), Guangzhou, China, Oct. 2022, pp. 146–151, doi: 10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9986703.

View Article

GB/T 51269-2017, Standard for Classification and Coding of Building Information Modelling. Beijing, China: China Architecture and Building Press, 2017. [in Chinese].

CH/Z 3005-2010, Specifications for Low-Altitude Digital Aerial Photography. Beijing, China: National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, 2010. [in Chinese].

Y. Deng, J. C. P. Cheng, and C. Anumba, “Mapping between BIM and 3D GIS in different levels of detail using schema mediation and instance comparison,” Autom. Constr., vol. 67, pp. 1–21, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.autc on.2016.03.006.