From Research Method to Cognitive Scaffold: Applying Grounded Theory Coding in University Source-Based History Instruction
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study has explored the application of Grounded Theory as a cognitive scaffold in university source-based history instruction. Drawing on the fourteen-week classroom practice and seventy student assignments, this study examined how coding-based analysis supports students’ historical thinking and source interpretation. Throughout the course, students worked step by step – beginning with open coding, moving into axial coding, and finally shaping their own thematic insights – all while engaging closely with historical sources. Rather than viewing assignments simply as learning outcomes, the researcher reconstructed students’ cognitive pathways through their course assignments. The findings suggest that coding-based instruction provides beginners with a practical entry point into historical source analysis, helping students moving beyond descriptive reading toward structured historical interpretation. At same time, the study also reflects on the limitations of procedural approaches in humanities education. While coding frameworks may help students organize their thinking more clearly, leaning too heavily on rigid procedures will unintentionally pull attention away from the richness of historical texts, and limit opportunities for deeper, more creative interpretation. Finally, the study argues that Grounded Theory can function not only as a pedagogical scaffold for students, but also as a reflective analytical tool for teachers seeking to better understand students’ historical reasoning processes.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
J. van Drie and C. van Boxtel, “Historical Reasoning: Towards a Framework for Analyzing Students’ Reasoning about the Past,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 80, p. 88, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1.
B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine Publishing, 1967.
J. Corbin and A. Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures For Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage, 1998.
Z. Wu, “A Grounded Theory Study on the Generation Mechanism of Pseudo-Engagement among University Learners in Digital-Intelligence Environments,” Educational Technology Research, vol. 6, pp. 78–85, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2026.06.010.
Z. Wu, “A Grounded Theory Study on the Generation Mechanism of Pseudo-Engagement among University Learners in Digital-Intelligence Environments,” Educational Technology Research, vol. 6, pp. 82–83, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2026.06.010.
H. Zhang and L. Zhou, “Exploring Teachers’ Academic Emotions in Graduate Classrooms: An Exploratory Analysis Based on Grounded Theory,” Higher Science Education, vol. 3, pp. 10–20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1028.g4.20260521.1313.002.
H. Zhang and L. Zhou, “Exploring Teachers’ Academic Emotions in Graduate Classrooms: An Exploratory Analysis Based on Grounded Theory,” Higher Science Education, vol. 3, pp. 15–16, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1028.g4.20260521.1313.002.
G. Kao, “How Undergraduate Students Develop Historical Source Analysis Ability: A Grounded Theory Case Study of the American Military History Course at Beijing Normal University,” Textile and Leather Review, vol. 9, pp. 4497–4516, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.31881/TLR.2026.4497.
J. Zhu and J. Mao, “The Historical Echoes of the Educator’s Spirit: Qian Bazi and the Reconstruction of the Foundation of China’s Independent System of Liberal Arts Education,” Wuling Journal, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 52, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.16514/j.cnki.cn43-1506/c.2026.02.007.