Students’ Creative Learning Engagement with AI Painting Tools: A Technology Acceptance and Learning Experience Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the increasing application of generative AI in art and design education, AI painting tools have become integrated into the idea development, visual experimentation, and image-making behavior of students. Nevertheless, studies have seldom investigated the impact of such a tool on the participation in creative learning. Based on technology acceptance and learning experience points of view, the presented paper explores how perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived creative control and teacher support influence creative learning engagement with flow experience and learning satisfaction acting as mediators. Questionnaire survey was administered to university students who have used AI painting tools and 382 respondents were obtained. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The results show that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived creative control positively influence flow experience. Learning satisfaction is also enhanced by perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived creative control, teacher support and flow experience. In addition, flow experience and learning satisfaction are associated with higher levels of creative learning engagement and learning satisfaction has the most direct effect. Such findings underline the importance of student agency, positive learning experience, and pedagogical support in AI-assisted creative learning.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
J. Oppenlaender, “The Creativity of Text-to-Image Generation,” In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference; ACM: Tampere Finland, November 16 2022; pp. 192–202.
T. A. Ringvold, I. Strand, P. Haakonsen, and K. S. Strand, “The AI Generative Text-to-Image Creative Learning Process: An Art and Design Educational Perspective,” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, vol. 29, pp. 359–379, 2024.
C.-W. Lee, “Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Design Education: An Exploration and Analysis to Enhance Student Creativity,” Engineering Proceedings, vol. 98, Art. no. 29, 2025.
H. Johnston, R. F. Wells, E. M. Shanks, T. Boey, and B. N. Parsons, “Student Perspectives on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Higher Education,” Int J Educ Integr, vol. 20, Art. no. 2, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4.
K. A. Bartlett and J. D. Camba, “Generative Artificial Intelligence in Product Design Education: Navigating Concerns of Originality and Ethics,” 2024.
A. E. Sousa and P. Cardoso, “Use of Generative AI by Higher Education Students,” Electronics, vol. 14, Art. no. 1258, 2025.
D. Lee, M. Arnold, A. Srivastava, K. Plastow, P. Strelan, F. Ploeckl, D. Lekkas, and E. Palmer, “The Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education Learning and Teaching: A Study of Educators’ Perspectives,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, Art. no. 100221, 2024.
J. Batista, A. Mesquita, and G. Carnaz, “Generative AI and Higher Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions from a Systematic Literature Review,” Information, vol. 15, Art. no. 676, 2024.
C. Bian, X. Wang, Y. Huang, S. Zhou, and W. Lu, “Effects of AI-Generated Images in Visual Art Education on Students’ Classroom Engagement, Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Load,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, pp. 1–14, 2025.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS quarterly, pp. 319–340, 1989.
J. McGuire, D. De Cremer, and T. Van de Cruys, “Establishing the Importance of Co-Creation and Self-Efficacy in Creative Collaboration with Artificial Intelligence,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, Art. no. 18525, 2024.
J. He, Q. Wang, and H. Lee, “Enhancing Online Learning Engagement: Teacher Support, Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Interaction,” BMC Psychol, vol. 13, Art. no. 696, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03016-0.
J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, pp. 59–109, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
I. M. V. Alejandro, J. M. P. Sanchez, G. G. Sumalinog, J. A. Mananay, C. E. Goles, and C. B. Fernandez, “Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Education,” STEM Education, vol. 4, pp. 445–465, 2024.
N. Wang, H. Kim, J. Peng, and J. Wang, “Exploring Creativity in Human– AI Co-Creation: A Comparative Study across Design Experience,” Frontiers in Computer Science, vol. 7, Art. no. 1672735, 2025.
J. Wu, Z. Yan, Y. Yang, J. Zhu, Y. Xiong, and J. Chen, “The Perceived Teacher Support Scale (PTSS) for Students: Development and Psychometric Studies,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 128, Art. no. 102487, 2024.
H. Zhao and A. Khan, “The Students’ Flow Experience with the Continuous Intention of Using Online English Platforms,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, Art. no. 807084, 2022.
T. T. A. Ngo, G. K. An, P. T. Nguyen, and T. T. Tran, “Unlocking Educational Potential: Exploring Students’ Satisfaction and Sustainable Engagement with ChatGPT Using the ECM Model,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 23, Art. no. 21, 2024.
M. Zhou and S. Peng, “The Usage of AI in Teaching and Students’ Creativity: The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement and the Moderating Role of AI Literacy,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, Art. no. 587, 2025.