Research on Dynamic Decision-making of Organizational Culture Fusion after Merger and Acquisition Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning and Agent Simulation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Organizational culture integration is a critical link in post-merger integration and directly affects the realization of merger and acquisition synergies. However, culture integration is dynamic, complex, and uncertain, making traditional static decision-making methods insufficient for handling multi-agent interaction and sudden conflicts. This study constructs a dynamic decision-making model for post-merger organizational culture fusion by integrating deep reinforcement learning and agent simulation. First, a multi-agent simulation system is developed to represent management agents, core employee agents, and ordinary employee agents, and to model cultural cognition, behavioral preferences, and interaction rules. Second, a deep Q-network is embedded to optimize integration decisions under state variables such as cultural difference, conflict level, and employee identification. Third, 30 merger and acquisition cases from manufacturing, finance, and technology industries are used for scenario simulation and validation. Experimental results show that the proposed model increases decision response speed by 32.6%, reduces cultural conflict occurrence by 28.9%, and improves integration success rate by 25.3%, demonstrating its effectiveness for dynamic cultural integration decision-making.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
M. L. Aribou, “Sociocultural integration and success mergers & acquisitions,” Revue Européenne du Droit Social, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 98-119, 2024.
C. E. Group, “Mergers & Acquisitions,” Chemical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 13-13, 2023.
R. T. Natarajan, “Seamless Integration and Enablement in Mergers and Acquisitions,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2081-2083, 2022.
“F&B Mergers and Acquisitions Landscape,” Food in Canada, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 30-30, 2023.
A. Sun, “Talent Management and Organizational Change in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions,” Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 99-102, 2024.
M. Bruno, “What To Expect in Top-Tier Mergers and Acquisitions,” Aviation week & space technology, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 56-59, 2022.
V. A. B. Silva and H. Gallucci Netto, “Mergers and Acquisitions in Recession Periods,” Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 497-515, 2022.
L. Yin, “A Case Study of Financial Integration in Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions,” Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 73-79, 2025.
F. Novita and R. Rasyid, “Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance Before and After Mergers and Acquisitions,” Financial Management Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 59-68, 2022.
S. E. Kim, “MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS mRNA giants make acquisitions,” Chemical and engineering news: “news edition” of the American Chemical Society, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 17-17, 2023.
C. Gonzalez and H. Heidari, “A cognitive approach to human–AI complementarity in dynamic decision-making,” Nature Reviews Psychology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 808-822, 2025.
L. Wang, Y. Wang, M. Chen, et al., “Multi-Round Dynamic Game Decision-Making of UAVs Based on Decision Tree,” Chinese Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1006-1016, 2025.
H. M. A. Farid, M. Riaz, and Z. A. Khan, “T-spherical fuzzy aggregation operators for dynamic decision-making with its application,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 72, no. c, pp. 97-115, 2023.