A Study on the Quantitative Evaluation Model for the Dissemination Effectiveness of Ideological and Political Discourse on Social Media Platforms
Main Article Content
Abstract
As social media has become a major channel for information dissemination, the communication path of ideological and political discourse has changed significantly. Scientifically evaluating dissemination effectiveness is essential for improving communication quality and optimizing discourse strategies. This study integrates communication effectiveness theory, ideological discourse characteristics, and social media dissemination patterns to construct a quantitative evaluation framework for ideological and political discourse on social media platforms. The framework includes five primary dimensions: dissemination breadth, dissemination depth, audience feedback, guidance effectiveness, and industry adaptability, which are further divided into 15 secondary indicators. A combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and entropy weighting is used to determine indicator weights, and a multidimensional comprehensive evaluation model is established. Empirical validation is conducted using cases from Douyin, WeChat Official Accounts, and specialized online platforms. The results show that the proposed model can effectively quantify dissemination effectiveness and provide methodological support for improving communication strategies, audience engagement, and discourse guidance in digital public communication environments.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
J. L. Freeman, P. H. Y. Caldwell, and K. M. Scott, “How Adolescents Trust Health Information on Social Media: A Systematic Review,” Acad Pediatr, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 703-719, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.12.011.
E. Frey, C. Bonfiglioli, M. Brunner, and J. Frawley, “Parents’ Use of Social Media as a Health Information Source for Their Children: A Scoping Review,” Acad Pediatr, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 526-539, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.006.
X. Zhu, B. Zhang, and H. Yuan, “Digital economy, industrial structure upgrading and green total factor productivity–Evidence in textile and apparel industry from China,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 11, Art. no. e0277259. Published 2022 Nov 4, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277259.
S. A. Al-Shami, R. Damayanti, H. Adil, F. Farhi, and A. Al Mamun, “Financial and digital financial literacy through social media use towards financial inclusion among batik small enterprises in Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 15, Art. no. e34902. Published 2024 Jul 19, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34902.
J. Kvasnicka, E. A. Cohen Hubal, T. F. M. Rodgers, and M. L. Diamond, “Textile Washing Conveys SVOCs from Indoors to Outdoors: Application and Evaluation of a Residential Multimedia Model,” Environ Sci Technol, vol. 55, no. 18, pp. 12517-12527, 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02674.
W. Wu, L. Huang, and F. Yang, “Social anxiety and problematic social media use: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Addict Behav, vol. 153, Art. no. 107995, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.107995.
L. Zhao, P. Xu, Y. Chen, and S. Yan, “A literature review of the research on students’ evaluation of teaching in higher education,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, Art. no. 1004487. Published 2022 Sep 29, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004487.
R. Boulkedid, H. Abdoul, M. Loustau, O. Sibony, and C. Alberti, “Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting health care quality indicators: a systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 6, Art. no. e20476, 2011, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476.
Z. Liu, Y. Li, G. Xu, and Y. Yu, “Effects of microplastics on black soil health: A global meta-analysis,” J Hazard Mater, vol. 490, Art. no. 137850, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137850.
N. V. Babu and E. G. M. Kanaga, “Sentiment Analysis in Social Media Data for Depression Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: A Review,” SN Comput Sci, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 74, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00958-1.
S. Pöllänen, “The meaning of craft: craft makers’ descriptions of craft as an occupation,” Scand J Occup Ther, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 217-227, 2013, doi: 10.3109/11038128.2012.725182.
F. Wang and M. Wu, “How does trade policy uncertainty affect China’s economy and energy?,” J Environ Manage, vol. 330, Art. no. 117198, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117198.
J. J. Van Bavel, C. E. Robertson, K. Del Rosario, J. Rasmussen, and S. Rathje, “Social Media and Morality,” Annu Rev Psychol, vol. 75, pp. 311-340, 2024, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-110258.
Q. Xu, Y. Xu, and C. Ma, “Analysis of contemporary value and influence of intangible cultural heritage based on online review mining,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 12, Art. no. e0315805. Published 2024 Dec 19, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315805.
R. Zhang, “Digital Media Teaching and Effectiveness Evaluation Integrating Big Data and Artificial Intelligence,” Comput Intell Neurosci, vol. 2022, Art. no. 1217846. Published 2022 Sep 22, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/1217846.