Optimizing the Efficiency of Heterogeneous Fusion of Multi-Source Information Nodes in Smart Government Platforms Using GraphSAGE

Main Article Content

M. Y. Wang

Abstract

To address low fusion efficiency in multi-source heterogeneous data and the difficulty of processing large-scale graph data in smart government platforms, this paper proposes a GraphSAGE-based optimization method. A heterogeneous graph structure with multiple node and edge types is first constructed, abstracting government entities into heterogeneous nodes and distinguishing business-related edge semantics. The GraphSAGE framework is improved using type-aware neighbor sampling and a multi-head attention aggregation function to preserve heterogeneous semantic features. Considering the temporal characteristics of government data, an LSTM dynamic modeling module is introduced to enhance the temporal evolution of node representations. A graph partitioning strategy combined with distributed training is further used to improve large-scale computation by optimizing communication and synchronization processes. Experiments show that the proposed method achieves node embedding accuracy of at least 0.95 and NMI of 0.88 in complex government graph scenarios, indicating high fusion quality. For 100,000 nodes, the training time is 12 seconds, with convergence achieved in 140 rounds. The results demonstrate that the method can effectively support large-scale heterogeneous graph representation, dynamic information fusion, and efficient decision-support modeling in smart platform environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wang, M. Y. (2026). Optimizing the Efficiency of Heterogeneous Fusion of Multi-Source Information Nodes in Smart Government Platforms Using GraphSAGE. Advanced Electromagnetics, 15(3), 4870–4880. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.3550
Section
Research Articles

References

I. S. Kalganov, “Assessment of the results of the functioning of e-government and digitalization of public services,” Intellect. Innovations. Investments, vol. (1), pp. 29-41, 2024, doi: 10.25198/2077-7175-2024-1-29.

View Article

M. Di Giulio and G. Vecchi, “Implementing digitalization in the public sector,” Technologies, agency, and governance. Public Policy and Administration, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 133-158, 2023, doi: 10.1177/09520767211023283.

View Article

D. Agostino, I. Saliterer, and I. Steccolini, “Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services,” Financial Accountability & Management, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 152-176, 2022, doi: 10.1111/faam.12301.

View Article

A. Androniceanu, I. Georgescu, and J. Kinnunen, “Public administration digitalization and corruption in the EU member states,” A comparative and correlative research analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 18, no. 65, pp. 5-22, 2022, doi: 10.24193/tras.65E.1.

View Article

S. R. Chohan and G. Hu, “Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: Cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency,” Information technology for development, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16-38, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713.

View Article

I. Dhaoui, “E-government for sustainable development: Evidence from MENA countries,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2070-2099, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0.

View Article

J. Lin, L. Carter, and D. Liu, “Privacy concerns and digital government: exploring citizen willingness to adopt the COVIDSafe app,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 389-402, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1920857.

View Article

D. Špaˇcek and Z. Špaˇcková, “Issues of e-government services quality in the digital-by-default era–the case of the national e-procurement platform in Czechia,” Journal of Public Procurement, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-34, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JOPP-02-2022-0004.

View Article

Y. Ma, Y. Qiu, W. Zhao, G. Li, M. Wu, and T. Jia, “DCIM-GCN: Digital computing-in-memory accelerator for graph convolutional network,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 2735-2748, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2024.3384748.

View Article

P. Do and P. Pham, “Heterogeneous graph convolutional network pre-training as side information for improving recommendation,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 15945-15961, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07251-z.

View Article

Y. Yang, “Research on the Innovation of “Last Kilometer” Delivery Mode of Rural E-commerce in Henan-Based on Dynamic Path Planning Technology (GAT),” European Journal of Business, Economics & Management, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8-16, 2025, doi: 10.71222/xqfpe028.

View Article

W. Zhou, Z. Xia, P. Dou, T. Su, and H. Hu, “Double attention based on graph attention network for image multilabel classification,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3519030.

View Article

S. Dhanasekaran, D. Gopal, J. Logeshwaran, N. Ramya, and A. O. Salau, “Multi-model traffic forecasting in smart cities using graph neural networks and transformer-based multi-source visual fusion for intelligent transportation management,” International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 518-541, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13177-024-00413-4.

View Article

Y. Tang, Y. Huang, J. Hou, and Z. Liu, “Type-adaptive graph Transformer for heterogeneous information networks,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 54, no. 22, pp. 11496-11509, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10489-024-05793-4.

View Article

J. Chen, T. Yu, Z. Pan, M. Zhang, G. Lu, and K. Zhu, “Stochastic dynamic power dispatch with human knowledge transfer using graph-GAN assisted inverse reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3303-3315, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2023.3329459.

View Article

Z. Guo, K. Yu, A. Jolfaei, A. K. Bashir, A. O. Almagrabi, and N. Kumar, “Fuzzy detection system for rumors through explainable adaptive learning,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 3650-3664, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3052109.

View Article

S. Li, N. A. Zaidi, M. Du, Z. Zhou, H. Zhang, and G. Li, “Property graph representation learning for node classification,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 237-265, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10115-023-01963-x.

View Article

Z. Zhong, C. T. Li, and J. Pang, “Personalised meta-path generation for heterogeneous graph neural networks,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2299-2333, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10618-022-00862-z.

View Article

M. Li, K. Liu, H. Liu, Z. Zhao, T. E. Ward, and X. Wu, “Heterogeneous meta-path graph learning for higher-order social recommendation,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1-25, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3673658.

View Article

R. Bing, G. Yuan, M. Zhu, F. Meng, H. Ma, and S. Qiao, “Heterogeneous graph neural networks analysis: a survey of techniques, evaluations and applications,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 8003-8042, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10375-2.

View Article

D. Cai, S. Qian, Q. Fang, J. Hu, and C. Xu, “User cold-start recommendation via inductive heterogeneous graph neural network,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1-27, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3560487.

View Article

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.