Differential Game Model of Collaborative Governance between Local Governments and Polluting Enterprises from the Perspective of Incentive Compatibility
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dynamic coordination between regulatory authorities and industrial enterprises is essential for achieving sustainable manufacturing and intelligent environmental governance. This study develops an incentive-compatible differential game framework to investigate the collaborative optimization of local government regulation and enterprise emission reduction under dynamic pollution evolution. By incorporating pollution stock as the state variable and regulatory intensity together with enterprise abatement effort as control variables, a feedback Nash equilibrium and a cooperative Pareto-optimal strategy are systematically derived. A state-dependent dynamic transfer payment mechanism is further designed to guarantee incentive compatibility while preserving individual rationality, enabling both participants to converge toward cooperative decision-making through recursive feedback optimization. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed mechanism significantly reduces long-term pollution accumulation, improves social welfare, and stabilizes the dynamic equilibrium under varying initial conditions. The framework establishes an effective dynamic control paradigm for intelligent environmental governance and provides valuable methodological references for distributed decision-making, networked optimization, and adaptive feedback systems in modern engineering applications, including digital industrial infrastructures and large-scale cyber-physical systems.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
J. Wang, X. Guo, and Q. Jiang, “The river chief system and the total factor productivity in China: Evidence from the industrial enterprises database,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 17, pp. 50319-50331, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25648-8.
J. Wang, X. Wan, and R. Tu, “Game analysis of the evolution of local governments river chief system implementation strategy,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1961-1961, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041961.
B. Chen, Gegentana, and Y. Wang, “The impact of environmental regulations on enterprise pollution emission from the perspective of overseeing the government,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 11311-11311, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151411311.
C. Li and N. Zuo, “Optimal R&D Investment Strategy of Pollution Abatement and Incentive Mechanism Design under Asymmetric Information,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 1042791-1042791, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/1042791.
C. Arguedas, F. Cabo, and G. Martín-Herrán, “Environmental regulation and inspection delegation with stock pollution,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-32, 2025.
L. Yang, Y. Liu, and H. Deng, “Environmental governance, local government competition and industrial green transformation: Evidence from Chinas sustainable development practice,” Sustainable Development, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1054-1068, 2023, doi: 10.1002/sd.2440.
F. Yin, Y. Xiao, R. Cao, et al., “Impacts of ESG disclosure on corporate carbon performance: empirical evidence from listed companies in heavy pollution industries,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 15296-15296, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152115296.
N. Yu and M. Lu, “Analysis of the dynamic evolution game of government, enterprise and the public to control industrial pollution,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2760-2760, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16072760.
Y. Niu, Y. Fu, X. Liu, et al., “Blockchain-based incentive mechanism for environmental, social, and governance disclosure: a principal-agent perspective,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 6318-6334, 2024, doi: 10.1002/csr.2916.
S. Marsiglio and N. Masoudi, “Transboundary pollution control and competitiveness concerns in a two-country differential game,” Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 105-118, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10666-021-09768-4.
Y. Zheng, H. Zhao, and C. He, “Robust control design with optimization for uncertain mechanical systems: Fuzzy set theory and cooperative game theory,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1377-1392, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12555-020-0874-y.
Y. Zhang, Y. Han, X. Ji, et al., “Continuous air purification by aqueous interface filtration and absorption,” Nature, vol. 610, no. 7930, pp. 74-80, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05124-y.
A. Razek M E, M. Nasr G E, A. Baiomy M, et al., “Exhaust emissions gases effects on environmental pollution and processing technologies,” Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 361-376, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41207-024-00577-1.
K. Patorisantis G, “Optimal control and differential game approaches in environmental and resource economics,” Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Development, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2025.
R. Cerqueti, L. Correani, and F. Di Dio, “Environmental policies in a Stackelberg differential game,” Naval Research Logistics (NRL), vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 358-375, 2023, doi: 10.1002/nav.22099.
K. Yuan and X. Wang, “Promoting cleaner production in ports: analysis of joint governance by central and local governments,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2678, no. 2, pp. 693-722, 2024, doi: 10.1177/03611981231175909.
G. Li, S. Wu, H. You, et al., “Governments behavioral strategies in cross-regional reduction of inefficient industrial land: Learned from a tripartite evolutionary game model,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04822-y.
Q. Huang and J. Shi, “Stackelberg stochastic differential games in feedback information pattern with applications,” Dynamic games and applications, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1191-1224, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13235-023-00549-0.
U. Sadana, V. Reddy P, and G. Zaccour, “Feedback Nash equilibria in differential games with impulse control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 4523-4538, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TAC.2022.3206253.
F. Tan and K. Qi, “Distributed non-cooperative games and distributed learning in linear and nonlinear systems: An overview,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 3843-3856, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2024.3377641.
K. Ildus, P. Ovanes, and L. Yin, “Non-autonomous Linear Quadratic Non-cooperative Differential Games with Continuous Updating,” Contributions to Game Theory and Management, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 132-154, 2022, doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu31.2022.11.
M. Zandebasiri, H. Jahanbazi Goujani, Y. Iranmanesh, et al., “Ecosystem services valuation: A review of concepts, systems, new issues, and considerations about pollution in ecosystem services,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 35, pp. 83051-83070, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28143-2.
G. Dolphin, M. Pahle, D. Burtraw, et al., “A net-zero target compels a backward induction approach to climate policy,” Nature climate change, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1033-1041, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41558-023-01798-y.
R. Balseiro S, O. Besbes, and F. Castro, “Mechanism design under approximate incentive compatibility,” Operations Research, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 355-372, 2024, doi: 10.1287/opre.2022.2359.
N. Piluso, “Is corporate social responsibility effective in improving environmental quality? Literature review,” Environmental Economics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-11, 2024, doi: 10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.01.
M. Fleurbaey and G. Ponthière, “The stakeholder corporation and social welfare,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 131, no. 9, pp. 2556-2594, 2023, doi: 10.1086/724318.
Q. Sun, X. Wang, G. Yang, et al., “Optimal constraint following for fuzzy mechanical systems based on a time-varying β-measure and cooperative game theory,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 7574-7587, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2022.3160158.
L. Han, J. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Shared control in pHRI: Integrating local trajectory replanning and cooperative game theory,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1263-1277, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TRO.2025.3532510.
T. Bayen, A. Bouali, and L. Bourdin, “The hybrid maximum principle for optimal control problems with spatially heterogeneous dynamics is a consequence of a pontryagin maximum principle for-local solutions,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 2412-2432, 2024, doi: 10.1137/23M155311X.
R. Bonalli and B. Bonnet, “First-order Pontryagin maximum principle for risk-averse stochastic optimal control problems,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1881-1909, 2023, doi: 10.1137/22M1489137.
B. Groom and F. Venmans, “The social value of offsets,” Nature, vol. 619, no. 7971, pp. 768-773, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06153-x.
A. Balmford, S. Keshav, F. Venmans, et al., “Realizing the social value of impermanent carbon credits,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1172-1178, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41558-023-01815-0.
S. Liu and R. Yang, “Adaptive predefined-time robust control for nonlinear time-delay systems with different power Hamiltonian functions,” AIMS Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 28153-28175, 2023, doi: 10.3934/math.20231441.
L. Galimberti C, L. Furieri, L. Xu, et al., “Hamiltonian deep neural networks guaranteeing nonvanishing gradients by design,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 3155-3162, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TAC.2023.3239430.
M. Cave, “Incentive regulation: Expectations, surprises, and the road forward,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 431-453, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11151-024-09976-8.
R. Ullah, H. Ahmad, U. Rehman F, et al., “Green innovation and Sustainable Development Goals in SMEs: The moderating role of government incentives,” Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 830-846, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JEAS-07-2021-0122.
L. Rong and M. Xu, “Impact of altruistic preference and government subsidy on the multinational green supply chain under dynamic tariff,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1928-1958, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01514-w.