Empowering Critical Thinking in EFL Learners’ Writing Through AIGC: A Model Based on the “Questioning-Dialectic-Reconstruction” Cyclical Framework
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rise of generative artificial intelligence presents unprecedented challenges and opportunities for EFL learners' writing instruction, especially when students are required to express technical concepts, experimental processes, and research arguments in advanced engineering fields such as electromagnetic waves, antennas, propagation, and radiofrequency systems. This technological shift enables students to organize engineering information with professional linguistic structures more effectively, fostering the specialized communicative competence required in academic and technical writing contexts. Traditional teaching models centered on language correction and model essay imitation have seen their efficacy diminish in the face of AIGC, potentially fostering intellectual passivity in students. This study aims to construct an AIGC-enabled teaching model for EFL learners' writing, centered on a “Questioning-Dialectic- Reconstructing” cycle. This model positions AIGC as a “thinking partner” and “dialectical opponent”, systematically integrating it into the pre-writing, drafting, and revision stages of the writing process. It guides students in transforming from passive content consumers into active and discerning knowledge constructors. The paper elaborates on the theoretical foundation, three-stage operational procedure, and supportive assessment system of the model, demonstrating its application through concrete instructional cases involving engineering-oriented writing tasks. The goal is to provide a theoretical model and practical guidelines for transforming writing pedagogy toward critical thinking in the AIGC era.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
M. Aljanabi, M. Ghazi, A. H. Ali, and S. A. Abed, “ChatGPT: Open possibilities,” Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 62-64, 2023, doi: 10.52866/ijcsm.2023.01.01.0018.
B. D. Lund and T. Wang, “Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News,” 2023; 3:26-29, doi: 10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009.
D. Yan, “Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation? Education and Information Technologies,” 2023; 28:13943-13967, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4.
W. J. Hartono, N. Nurfitri, R. Ridwan, E. B. S. Kase, F. Lake, and R. S. Y. Zebua, “Artificial Intelligence (Al) solutions in English language teaching: Teacher-student’s perceptions and experiences,” Journal on Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1452-1461, 2023, doi: 10.31004/joe.v6i1.3101.
Y. C. Tseng and Y. H. Lin, “Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learners’ Writing with ChatGPT: A University-Level Course Design,” Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 78-97, 2024, doi: 10.34190/ejel.21.5.3329.
J. S. Barrot, “Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials,” Assessing Writing, vol. 57, 100745, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745.
E. A. Van Dis, J. Bollen, W. Zuidema, R. Van Rooij, and C. L. Bockting, “ChatGPT: Five priorities for research,” Nature, vol. 614, no. 7947, pp. 224-226, 2023, doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7.
D. Zou, H. R. Xie, and F. L. Wang, “Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, doi: 10.1007/s12528-022-09337-y.
Q. F. Wen and M. C. Liang, “Human-AI interactive negotiation competence: ChatGPT and foreign language education,” Foreign Language Teaching and Research, vol. 2, pp. 286-296, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://wjyy.publish.founderss.cn/en/article/67477843/.
C. Song and Y. Song, “Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 1-14, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843.
L. Kohnke, B. L. Moorhouse, and D. Zou, “ChatGPT for language teaching and learning,” RELC Journal, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 537-550, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-51447-0_97-1.
R. Michel-Villarreal, E. Vilalta-Perdomo, D. E. Salinas-Navarro, R. Thierry-Aguilera, and F. S. Gerardou, “Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 856, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13090856.
Z. Yang, J. Wang, and X. C. Wu, “Exploring the impact of ChatGPT/AIGC on education and strategies for response,” Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), vol. 7, pp. 26–35, 2023, doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.07.003.
L. Flower and J. R. Hayes, “A cognitive process theory of writing,” College Composition and Communication, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 365-387, 1981, doi: 10.58680/ccc198115885.
C. J. Bean and D. Melzer, “Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (3rd ed.),” San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass; 2021.
L. S. Vygotsky, “Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes,” Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press; 1978, [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.sg/dp/0674576292?ref_=mr_referred_us_sg_sg.
R. Paul and L. Elder, “The Nature and Functions of Critical & Creative Thinking,” Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman & Littlefield; 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.sg/Nature-Functions-Critical-Creative-Thinking/dp/0944583261.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
M. Caulfield, “Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers,” Pressbooks; 2017, [Online]. Available: https://webliteracy.pressbooks.com.