Application of Intelligent Assisted Technology in Green Environmental Art Design and Analysis of Sustainable Paths
Main Article Content
Abstract
The integration of intelligent design technologies with sustainable environmental planning requires effective multimodal information processing and adaptive optimization mechanisms to improve ecological performance while maintaining design quality. This paper proposes an intelligent ecological design framework based on a multimodal generative adversarial network (GAN) for green environmental art design. The proposed model combines convolutional feature extraction, semantic embedding, and attention-guided multimodal fusion to jointly represent visual, structural, and ecological information, while an ecological constraint generator and a dual discriminator incorporating structural similarity and energy consumption prediction enable coordinated optimization of aesthetic expression and environmental performance. An adaptive feedback mechanism further updates model parameters according to ecological indicators to achieve closed-loop optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that the generated designs maintain carbon emissions within 48–53 kg CO, energy consumption between 118 and 123 kWh, and ecological consistency indices of 0.87–0.91 while preserving stable visual coordination. Beyond sustainable environmental design, the proposed multimodal perception and optimization strategy provides methodological support for intelligent spatial planning in electromagnetic sensing environments, wireless monitoring infrastructures, and smart built systems where heterogeneous information fusion and energy-aware decision-making are essential for reliable operation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
K. Wang, “Application of green pollution-free materials in environmental art design,” Science of Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41-49, 2023, doi: 10.1166/sam.2023.4427.
Y. Sang, “Application in environmental art design practice based on a fuzzy evaluation system,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, Art. no. 12441, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62477-2.
H. Liu, G. Song, and L. Yan, “Research on the application mode of green environment design under the background of artificial intelligence,” Complexity, vol. 2021, no. 1, Art. no. 8914304, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/8914304.
A. E. S. Nosseir, A. Cervone, and A. Pasini, “Review of state-of-the-art green monopropellants: For propulsion systems analysts and designers,” Aerospace, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/aerospace8010020.
W. Fan, B. Yan, Q. Bao, Y. Zhao, and J. Zhou, “Green evaluation for building interior decoration based on BIM-BN technology,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 744, 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13030744.
T. Semeraro, A. Scarano, R. Buccolieri, A. Santino, and E. Aarrevaara, “Planning of urban green spaces: An ecological perspective on human benefits,” Land, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 105, 2021, doi: 10.3390/land10020105.
S. S. Mishra and D. Sakharle, “Design of green roof for an energy efficient university campus,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 65, pp. 1546-1550, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.505.
H. Hussein, L. K. Jhung, and H. Zhang, “Green Pause in a City: Design elements of a pocket park in Kuala Lumpur,” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, vol. 7, no. 19, pp. 191-200, 2022, doi: 10.21834/ebpj.v7i19.3206.
A. Balachandran, H. Parayilkalapurackal, S. Rajpoot, and S. Lone, “Bioinspired green fabricating design of multidimensional surfaces for atmospheric water harvesting,” ACS Applied Bio Materials, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44-63, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsabm.2c00804.
G. Caprari, G. Castelli, M. Montuori, M. Camardelli, and R. Malvezzi, “Digital twin for urban planning in the green deal era: A state of the art and future perspectives,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 6263, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14106263.
J. Yu, Z. Wang, L. Hu, Q. Chen, J. Yang, and Y. Zhou, “Research on the Assistance and Countermeasures of Digital Empowerment in the Environment of Carbon Emission Reduction,” Journal of Big Data and Computing (ISSN: 2959-0590), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83, 2024, doi: 10.62517/jbdc.202401212.
T. M. Mata, G. M. Oliveira, H. Monteiro, G. V. Silva, N. S. Caetano, and A. A. Martins, “Indoor air quality improvement using nature-based solutions: design proposals to greener cities,” International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 8472, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168472.
L. Liu, “Scene Classification in the Environmental Art Design by Using the Lightweight Deep Learning Model under the Background of Big Data,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2022, no. 1, Art. no. 9066648, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/9066648.
J. Hutson, J. Lively, and J. Weber, “In the studio with virtual reality: Student perceptions and potential integrations into art and design curriculum,” art, design & communication in higher education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 235-256, 2022, doi: 10.1386/adch_00056_1.
Y. Lei, Z. Su, X. He, and C. Cheng, “Immersive virtual reality application for intelligent manufacturing: Applications and art design,” Matematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 4353-4387, 2023, doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023202.
X. Chen, “Environmental landscape design and planning system based on computer vision and deep learning,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, Art. no. 20220092, 2023, doi: 10.1515/jisys-2022-0092.
M. Zahiri, A. Sohrabi S, and S. Dehghan, “Increasing Energy Efficiency During Design Case Study: Building and Green Space of the Museum of Visual Arts,” International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1567-1572, 2023, doi: 10.62225/2583049X.2023.3.6.3917.
J. Ma, T. Inoue, Q. Fang, K. Li, and M. Li, “A Study on Optimal Opening Configuration for Art Museum Exhibition Space Considering Daylight Performance, Indoor Thermal Comfort, and Energy Consumption,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 23, Art. no. 16431, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152316431.
D. Auge, J. Hille, E. Mueller, and A. Knoll, “A survey of encoding techniques for signal processing in spiking neural networks,” Neural Processing Letters, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 4693-4710, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11063-021-10562-2.
C. Wang, H. Yan, W. Huang, W. Sheng, Y. Wang, Y. S. Fan, et al., “Neural encoding with unsupervised spiking convolutional neural network,” Communications Biology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 880, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05257-4.
G. A. Vargas-Hakim, E. Mezura-Montes, and H. G. Acosta-Mesa, “A review on convolutional neural network encodings for neuroevolution,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12-27, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2021.3088631.
G. W. Lindsay, “Convolutional neural networks as a model of the visual system: Past, present, and future,” Journal of cognitive neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 2017-2031, 2021, doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01544.
P. Kumar and V. Gupta, “Restoration of damaged artworks based on a generative adversarial network,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 82, no. 26, pp. 40967-40985, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-15222-2.
R. Garozzo, C. Santagati, C. Spampinato, and G. Vecchio, “Knowledge-based generative adversarial networks for scene understanding in Cultural Heritage,” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 35, Art. no. 102736, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102736.
X. Chen and L. Chen, “Exploration of adaptive environment design strategy based on reinforcement learning in cad environment,” CAD Computer-Aided Design, vol. 21, pp. 175-190, 2024, doi: 10.14733/cadaps.2024.S23.175-190.
Y. Tian, X. Li, H. Ma, X. Zhang, K. C. Tan, and Y. Jin, “Deep reinforcement learning based adaptive operator selection for evolutionary multi-objective optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1051-1064, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TETCI.2022.3146882.
N. McCartney and J. Tynan, “Fashioning contemporary art: a new interdisciplinary aesthetics in art-design collaborations,” Journal of Visual Art Practice, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 143-162, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14702029.2021.1940454.
S. Sina A and J. Wu, “The effects of retail environmental design elements in virtual reality (VR) fashion stores,” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2023, doi: 10.1080/09593969.2022.2049852.
C. Cucuzzella, “Analysing eco-art installations for their value in affecting change,” International Journal of education through art, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 43-58, 2023, doi: 10.1386/eta_00117_1.
M. Taheri and E. Afzaltousi, “A phenomenological reflection on the aesthetic experience in the contemporary en-vironmental art (Case Study: The Weather Project),” Theoretical Principles of Visual Arts, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 146-160, 2023.
A. Kadry and E. Hussien, “Applications of Virtual Reality Technologies in the Field of Design and Arts,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Art and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 44-70, 2023, doi: 10.21608/ijmsat.2024.274902.1022.
H. He, M. Wu, and J. Gyergyak, “Intervention and renewal-Interpretation of installation art in urban public space,” Pollack Periodica, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 139-145, 2021, doi: 10.1556/606.2021.00362.
A. S. Arulraj and S. Don Bosco, “Connecting art and development: studying the role of city art on bridges in forwarding urban sustainability,” Local Environment, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 919-931, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13549839.2024.2319639.
T. Gao and L. Kuang, “Cognitive loading and knowledge hiding in art design education: Cognitive engagement as mediator and supervisor support as moderator,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 837374, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837374.
G. Li, Y. Huang, and W. Ye, “Research on the construction of intelligent-aided design platform for green buildings,” Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2907-2917, 2025, doi: 10.1177/14727978251314565.