Standardization of Translation of Green Leather Processing Terminology: Taking Chrome-Free Tanning and Bio-Based Tanning Agents as Examples
Main Article Content
Abstract
Accurate cross-linguistic representation of technical terminology is essential for knowledge sharing and international collaboration in emerging sustainable manufacturing technologies. This study addresses semantic ambiguity and conceptual inconsistency in the translation of green leather processing terminology by focusing on chrome-free tanning and bio-based tanning agents. A Domain-Adaptive Semantic Mapping (DASM) framework is proposed to integrate terminology theory with deep semantic learning. The method constructs a structured bilingual corpus and employs an improved XLM-RoBERTa-based semantic component parser to decompose terms into core concept, process attribute, and ecological attribute subspaces for fine-grained cross-language alignment. A semantic density–driven decision strategy further optimizes standardized translation selection by balancing conceptual equivalence and system consistency. Experimental evaluation demonstrates translation accuracy of 99.1% for Level 1 bio-based tanning terminology, terminology network modularity of 0.72, and a relation misalignment rate of only 3.2%, while maintaining robust performance for structurally complex concepts. Beyond supporting standardized terminology management in leather science, the proposed framework provides a transferable methodology for multilingual technical communication, semantic knowledge organization, and international standardization in engineering disciplines where precise information representation and interoperable terminology are critical, including digital communication and intelligent engineering systems.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
M. Jiang, Y. Xiao, J. Sang, C. Wang, J. Zhou, and W. Lin, “Biomass-based Tanning Agent for Sustainable Leather Manufacture via Cyanuric Chloride Modified Chitooligosaccharide,” Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 417-427, 2023, doi: 10.34314/jalca.v118i10.8230.
R. Wise W, J. Davis S, E. Hendriksen W, D. J. von Behr, S. Prabakar, and Y. Zhang, “Zeolites as sustainable alternatives to traditional tanning chemistries,” Green Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 4260-4270, 2023, doi: 10.1039/D3GC00381G.
I. Quaratesi, M. C. Micu, E. Rebba, C. Carsote, N. Proietti, V. Di Tullio, et al., “Cleaner leather tanning and posttanning processes using oxidized alginate as biodegradable tanning agent and nano-hydroxyapatite as potential flame retardant,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 24, pp. 4676, 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15244676.
S. Radetska, “CHALLENGES AND INNOVATIONS IN SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL TRANSLATION: TERMINOLOGICAL COMPLEXITIES AND ‘FALSE FRIENDS’,” The Modern Higher Education Review, vol. (9), pp. 119-131, 2024, doi: 10.28925/2617-5266/2024.97.
C. Bertulessi, “Terminology, popularisation and ideology in contemporary China: The ‘Scientific & Technical Term of the Day’column,” Terminology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 58-80, 2024, doi: 10.1075/term.00077.ber.
B. Li, “Conceptual deviation in terminology translation: A case study on translating COVID-19 terminology in multilingual news media,” Terminology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 351-382, 2023, doi: 10.1075/term.00073.li.
A. A. Matveyuk, A. A. Merker, and Y. A. Nizhelskaya, “ISSUES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION OF TECHNICAL TERMINOLOGY IN THE TRANSLATION OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL TEXTS,” Bectnik nayki, pp. 4(11 (68)):534-539, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issues-of-internationalstandardization-of-technical-terminology-in-the-translation-of-scientific-and-technical-texts/viewer.
Y. Hou, “Pruning translation of logical and accidental polysemy in traditional Chinese medicine terminology,” Terminology, pp. 31(2):, 2025, doi: 311-334. 10.1075/term.24007.hou.
O. A. Alkhonini, “Addressing polysemy in translation pedagogy,” Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40862-025-00328-x.
T. O. Tafa, S. Z. M. Hashim, M. S. Othman, H. Alhussian, M. Nasser, S. J. Abdulkadir, et al., “Machine Translation Performance for LowResource Languages: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 72486-72505, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3562918.
A. L. Tonja, O. Kolesnikova, A. Gelbukh, and G. Sidorov, “Low-resource neural machine translation improvement using source-side monolingual data,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1201, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13021201.
S. Araghi and A. Palangkaraya, “The link between translation difficulty and the quality of machine translation: a literature review and empirical investigation,” Language Resources and Evaluation, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1093-1114, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10579-024-09735-x.
T. Zhao and M. B. Alias, “Automated programming approaches to enhance computer-aided translation accuracy,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 10, pp. e2396, 2024, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2396.
K. Xu, Y. Feng, Q. Li, Z. Dong, and J. Wei, “Survey on terminology extraction from texts,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40537-025-01077-x.
Y. Yu, H. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Zhou, and B. Shi, “Construction of a chrome-free tanning system based on highlyoxidized starch–zirconium complexes,” Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 87-95, 2022, doi: 10.34314/jalca.v117i3.4887.
C. K. Ozkan and H. Ozgunay, “Alternative tanning agent for leather industry from a sustainable source: dialdehyde starch by periodate oxidation,” Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 89-99, 2021, doi: 10.34314/jalca.v116i3.4249.
W. Ding, X. Wang, J. Remón, Z. Jiang, X. Pang, Z. Ding, et al., “Engineering an epoxy tanning agent via facile functionalization of sucrose with silane coupling agent for sustainable leather production,” Collagen and Leather, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 18, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s42825-025-00200-1.
Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Biodegradability of leather: a crucial indicator to evaluate sustainability of leather,” Collagen and Leather, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s42825-024-00151-z.
R. K. Das, A. Mizan, F. T. Zohra, S. Ahmed, K. S. Ahmed, and H. Hossain, “Extraction of a novel tanning agent from indigenous plant bark and its application in leather processing,” Journal of Leather Science and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s42825-022-00092-5.
A. Soliman, “An unsupervised linguistic-based model for automatic glossary term extraction from a single PDF textbook,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 16089-16125, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11818-1.
A. Nugumanova, D. Akhmed-Zaki, M. Mansurova, Y. Baiburin, and A. Maulit, “NMF-based approach to automatic term extraction,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 199, p. 117179, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117179.
B. Li, Y. He, and W. Xu, “Cross-lingual named entity recognition using parallel corpus: A new approach using xlm-roberta alignment,” preprint arXiv:2101.11112, 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2101.11112.
J. A. Ortiz-Zambrano, C. H. Espín-Riofrío, and A. Montejo-Ráez, “Deep encodings vs. linguistic features in lexical complexity prediction,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1171-1187, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00521-024-10662-9.
D. Nikolaev and S. Padó, “Investigating semantic subspaces of transformer sentence embeddings through linear structural probing,” preprint arXiv:2310.11923, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.11923.
W. Ponwitayarat, P. Limkonchotiwat, E. Chuangsuwanich, et al., “Space decomposition for sentence embedding,” preprint arXiv:2406.03125, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.03125.
S. Banerjee, B. R. Chakravarthi, and J. P. McCrae, “Cross-Lingual Ontology Matching using Structural and Semantic Similarity,” LREC-COLING 2024; 2024:11, [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2024.ldl-1.2/.
D. Witschard, I. Jusufi, R. M. Martins, K. Kucher, and A. Kerren, “Interactive optimization of embedding-based text similarity calculations,” Information Visualization, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 335-353, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14738716221114372.
A. Gašpar, S. Seljan, and V. Kučiš, “Measuring Terminology Consistency in Translated Corpora: Implementation of the Herfindahl-Hirshman Index,” Information, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 43, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13020043.
K. Semenov and O. Bojar, “Automated Evaluation Metric for Terminology Consistency in MT,” WMT 2022; 2022:450, doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.wmt-1.41.
K. Vera, K. Svetlana, and R. Oksana, “Methodology and technique for assessing the terminology consistency in translations: Based on Latvian and Russian economic texts,” Bectnik Rocciyckogo yniverciteta dryzhby narodov. Ceriya: Teoriya yazyka. Cemiotika. Cemantika, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 9-35, 2023, doi: 10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-1-9-35.
A. Anastasopoulos, L. Besacier, J. Cross, M. Gallé, P. Koehn, and V. Nikoulina, “On the evaluation of machine translation for terminology consistency,” preprint arXiv:2106.11891, 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.11891.
C. S. Devi, B. S. Purkayastha, and L. S. Meetei, “An empirical study on english-mizo statistical machine translation with bible corpus,” International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 759-765, 2022, doi: 10.32985/ijeces.13.9.4.
Z. Kozhirbayev, “Enhancing neural machine translation with fine-tuned mBART50 Pre-Trained model: An examination with low-resource translation pairs,” Ingenierie des Systemes d’Information, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 831, 2024, doi: 10.18280/isi.290304.
T. Gupta, M. Zaki, N. M. A. Krishnan, and Mausam, “MatSciBERT: A materials domain language model for text mining and information extraction,” npj Computational Materials, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 102, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w.
S. M. Akpaca, “A Practical Approach to Terminological Research in Specialized Translation,” Journal of Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 86-97, 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i6.3980.