Research on the Construction and Application of Teaching Evaluation Model Based on AI Algorithm
Main Article Content
Abstract
Educational evaluation is a core lever for teaching reform and a key support for measuring teaching quality, optimizing teaching processes, and promoting the common development of teachers and students. Traditional teaching evaluation relies heavily on manual qualitative scoring and single-indicator quantitative assessment, resulting in fixed dimensions, subjective interference, low data utilization, delayed feedback, and insufficient personalization. To address these limitations, this study constructs a teaching evaluation model based on artificial intelligence algorithms. A combined weighting method integrating analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method is used to determine indicator weights, while BP neural networks and random forest algorithms are introduced for fitting, classification, abnormal-data identification, and model verification. A dynamic evaluation index system covering teacher literacy, classroom implementation, student learning status, course-resource construction, and teaching effectiveness is established. The model is tested in university blended classrooms, smart classrooms, and vocational training scenarios. Smart education environments increasingly rely on wireless classroom sensing, intelligent terminals, and electromagnetic data acquisition infrastructures; therefore, the proposed model also considers real-time, multi-source, and technically reliable teaching data collection. The results support more objective, timely, and adaptive teaching evaluation.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
L. Wang, “Construction and Application of University English Teaching Evaluation System - Based on the DPSIR Model,” Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.2478/AMNS-2024-1577.
P. Chen, M. Li, X. Ya, et al., “Research on Teaching Evaluation System Based on Decision Tree Algorithm,” Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, pp. 142-149, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-63133-7_14.
B. Karan and C. Chakma, “Mapping the Landscape of Research on AI Application in English Language Education: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 733-760, 2026, doi: 10.1177/00472395261435620.
K. Metin G and M. Cetin, “Teachers’ Experiences with AI in K-12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 711-732, 2026, doi: 10.1177/00472395261415889.
S. Sandbukt and B. Winthereik R, “Fibreglass and steel: De-imagineering AI value claims for Danish SMEs,” Anthropological Theory, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 171-191, 2026, doi: 10.1177/14634996251352390.
J. Laciste S M and F. Sy R A, “AI as Co-Creator: Mapping the Multi-Touchpoint Smart Tourist Decision Journey,” Journal of Smart Tourism, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 202-205, 2026, doi: 10.1177/27652157261427121.
E. Sherly, L. Pillai G, K. Manohar, et al., “Machine Translation: Best Practices using Deep Learning and Generative AI,” CRC Press; 2026.
M. Akben, B. Mercado, and J. McSweeney, “Bringing Historical Management Theories to Life: An Experiential Exercise Using Generative AI,” Management Teaching Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 340-361, 2026, doi: 10.1177/23792981241304632.
D. Oerther B, S. Oerther, and V. Gadhamshetty, “Artificial Intelligence Is Not a Calculator: A Sociotechnical Mediator of Knowledge and Action for Engineers, Scientists, and Health Professionals,” Environmental Engineering Science, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 195-198, 2026, doi: 10.1177/15579018261443025.
K. Young and J. Jack, “Artificial intelligence-driven design and optimization opportunities in bio-electrocatalytic CO2 conversion systems,” Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, vol. 52, Art. no. 101256, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2026.101256.
T. Rintamaki, D. Golpayegani, D. Lewis, et al., “Impact assessment requirements in the GDPR vs the AI Act: Overlaps, divergence, and implications,” Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 61, Art. no. 106317, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2026.106317.
I. Rubin, S. Illarionova, N. Belyakov, et al., “Multi-image super-resolution in remote sensing: A review of artificial intelligence techniques and challenges,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 246, pp. 643-663, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2026.04.043.
S. Bokhari A A, “Artificial intelligence, governance, and economic growth: Toward a new theory of digital developmentalism,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 13, Art. no. 102842, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102842.
R. Geddam, M. Awais, M. Khan A, et al., “Smart home optimisation for sustainable cities: The Ai-CareASDL framework for resource management and carbon footprint reduction,” Results in Engineering, vol. 30, Art. no. 110418, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110418.
A. Wittler and B. Sobczak, “Comparative analysis of dual modality telehealth simulation within a nurse practitioner program,” Clinical Simulation in Nursing, vol. 115, Art. no. 101965, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2026.101965.
C. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Zheng, et al., ““Speaking” based on the “goal”: The interactive effect of AI tour guide language types and tourism goal specificity on tourists’ intention to follow recommendations,” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, vol. 67, Art. no. 101452, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2026.101452.
T. Wu, X. Li, J. Li, et al., “Large language models-enhanced multi-timescale scheduling optimization in low-carbon industrial parks with multi-modal process memory,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 74, no. PB, Art. no. 104748, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2026.104748.
M. Raeei A, “Toward resilient water infrastructure using artificial intelligence technologies for sustainable recourses of water,” Next Sustainability, vol. 7, Art. no. 100329, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.nxsust.2026.100329.
M. Zook, J. Loomis, and K. Lim F, “Economic geographies of AI: Predicting, prescribing and programming economic futures,” Progress in Economic Geography, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 100071, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.peg.2026.100071.
R. Wagner, M. Fonseca E F, and D. Pinto C, “A topic modeling analysis of health decision delegation to generative artificial intelligence,” Healthcare Analytics, vol. 9, Art. no. 100465, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.health.2026.100465.