Research on the Development of a Three-dimensional Visualization System for Optimizing Indoor Displays
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study develops a three-dimensional (3D) visualization system for optimizing indoor display layouts. The system integrates high-precision 3D modeling, real-time point cloud acquisition using RGB-D cameras and LiDAR sensors, semantic tagging, and object tracking, combined with metaheuristic optimization algorithms including Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and multi-objective Pareto modeling. By applying Euclidean distance-based clearance validation, weighted cost functions, and cognitive load theory, the system enhances layout accuracy, workflow efficiency, and user decision-making while reducing cognitive effort. Experiments demonstrate a 28% reduction in task completion time and a 35% lower subjective cognitive load compared with traditional 2D CAD tools. The framework is particularly suitable for wireless communication-enabled industrial environments and antenna-supported sensor networks, where real-time, reliable, and low-latency data transmission is critical for interactive visualization and optimization. Future integration with AR/VR and AI-based automation is proposed to further improve adaptability, responsiveness, and scalability in engineering applications.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
V. Trif, “Spatial Cognition: Theoretical Considerations,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 187, pp. 168–172, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281501825X.
L. De Cock, N. Van de Weghe, K. Ooms, I. Saenen, N. Van Kets, and G. Van Wallendael, “Linking the cognitive load induced by route instruction types and building configuration during indoor route guidance: A usability study in VR,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1978–2008, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13658816.2022.2032080.
Z. Hu, L. Zhang, Q. Shen, X. Chen, W. Wang, and K. Li, “An integrated framework for residential layout designs: Combining parametric modeling, neural networks, and multi-objective optimization for outdoor activity space optimization,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 80, pp. 202–216, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016823007330.
S. Nesmachnow, “An overview of metaheuristics: Accurate and efficient methods for optimisation,” International Journal of Metaheuristics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 320–347, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmheur.2014.068914
D. A. Smith, K. Beaumont, T. S. Maurer, and L. Di, “Clearance in drug design: Miniperspective,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 2245–2255, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01263.
S. Sepp, S. J. Howard, S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, and F. Paas, “Cognitive load theory and human movement: Towards an integrated model of working memory,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 31, pp. 293-317, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-019-09461-9.
F. Valdez, “Swarm intelligence: A review of optimization algorithms based on animal behavior,” in Recent Advances of Hybrid Intelligent Systems Based on Soft Computing. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021, pp. 273-298, [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-58728-4_16.
M. Shariati, M. S. Mafipour, P. Mehrabi, A. Bahadori, Y. Zandi, M. N. A. Salih, et al., “Application of a hybrid artificial neural network-Particle swarm optimization (ANN-PSO) model in behavior prediction of channel shear connectors embedded in normal and high-strength concrete,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 5534, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/24/5534.
C. Lange, J. Costley, and S. L. Han, “The effects of extraneous load on the relationship between self-regulated effort and germane load within an e-learning environmen,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 64-83, 2017, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3028.
L. Kørnøv, E. R. Boess, J. Gordon, S. Q. Eliasen, M. R. Partidario, and M. B. Monteiro, “Causal Map Tool of Cause-Effect Relations and Biodiversity Mitigation Hierarchy Connected to Spatial Planning,” Aalborg, Denmark: Det Danske Center for Miljøvurdering, Aalborg University; 2024.
A. Rella and F. Vitolla, “Efficiency metrics for performance measurement: A review in higher education of main methods and determinants,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 841-866, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2024-0049.