Diasporic Garment in Overseas Chinese Literature: The Cultural Memory of the Cheongsam in the 20th Century Nanyang Writings
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the qipao (cheongsam) in terms of its garment construction, material properties, and sartorial evolution as represented in twentieth-century Nanyang (Southeast Asian) Chinese literature. Through systematic textual analysis, it examines how textile characteristics—including fiber selection, fabric architecture, garment configuration, and decorative techniques such as embroidery and batik motifs—operate as narrative mechanisms for cultural expression and identity formation. The findings reveal that the adaptation of the qipao to tropical environments involved substantial modifications in material selection and structural design to improve wearability, thermal comfort, and functional practicality while preserving symbolic continuity. The qipao consequently emerges as a diasporic garment whose physical configuration evolves into a tangible archive of cultural memory, reflecting the dynamic negotiation between tradition and local adaptation. By integrating literary criticism with textile history and clothing studies, this research demonstrates that literary descriptions of material structures can illuminate the social evolution and technological transformation of garments. Furthermore, the analysis provides methodological insights into hierarchical pattern organization, material–structure relationships, and functional surface representation, offering potential reference for computational textile modeling, wearable engineering, and electromagnetic functional fabric design involving complex patterned structures.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
E. Tagliacozzo and W. C. Chang, “Chinese Circulations: Capital, Commodities and Networks in Southeast Asia,” Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press; 2011, doi: 10.1215/9780822393573.
Y. L. Chong, “The Evolution of the Urban Pattern of Southeast Asia During the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,” London, UK: University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (United Kingdom);, [Online]. Available: 1976. https://www.proquest.com/openview/1a2040d8d2d6b3a5a0cf69a006ee0061/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y.
F. O. Asifat, “What We Carry Carries Us: Narratives of African Immigrants Through Cultural Artifacts in the United States,” Syracuse, NY, USA: Syracuse University; 2025, [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/openview/ed2d4b32600974af3393d8d312818588/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
K. F. Chiu, “Empire of the Chinese Sign: The Question of Chinese Diasporic Imagination in Transnational Literary Production,” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 593-620, 2008, doi: 10.1017/S0021911808000703.
Q. Huang, “Fashioning Modernity and Qipao in Republican Shanghai (1910s-1930s),” Athens, OH, USA: Ohio University; 2015, [Online]. Available: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=ohiou1429701221&disposition=inline.
H. Clark, “Fashioning “China Style” in the Twenty-First Century,” in Paulicelli E, Clark H, editors. The Fabric of Cultures: Fashion, Identity, and Globalization. London, UK: Routledge, 2009, pp. 193-209.
A. Finnane, “Changing Clothes in China Fashion, History, Nation,” New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press; 2008.
C. R. Mahmud, “Objects are not just a thing – (re)negotiating identity through using material objects within the Kurdish diaspora in the UK,” Applied Linguistics Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 293-320, 2025, doi: 10.1515/applirev-2024-0055.
E. G. Yalçın, “Navigating Global Migration: An Analysis of Exit West through Appadurai’s Five Scapes,” Cankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 383-398, 2024, doi: 10.47777/cankujhss.1554566.
H. K. Bhabha, “The Location of Culture (2nd ed.),” London, UK: Routledge; 1994, doi: 10.4324/9780203820551.
D. Stuber, “Review of Marianne Hirsch, The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust,” Bryn Mawr Review of Comparative Literature, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 5, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmrcl/vol10/iss2/5.
S. Han, “A Many-Splendoured Thing,” London, UK: Jonathan Cape; 1952.
G. Wang, “Home is Not Here,” Singapore: NUS Press; 2018.
C. Lim, “Little Ironies: Stories of Singapore,” Portsmouth, NH, USA: Heinemann; 1978.