Tracking the Evolution of Member Roles in Practice Communities with Integrated Knowledge Graphs and Mining the Path to Building the Identity of Entrepreneurial Mentors
Main Article Content
Abstract
Member-role evolution and entrepreneurial mentor identification in Practice Communities have the following problems: high difficulty in dynamic tracking, insufficient integration of multi-dimensional features and implicit evolutionary path. Therefore, this paper proposes a two-layer analysis framework based on Knowledge Graph (KG): Firstly, a multi-dimensional knowledge graph based on member interaction, knowledge contribution and social network is constructed and member-role-behavior triplets are defined by entity extraction and relation mining; Secondly, a kind of Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (TGCN) is designed to capture trajectory of role evolution and PageRank algorithm is used to quantify node influence and discover the evolutionary path from peripheral participant to core mentor; Finally, a path mining algorithm is used to extract key transformation node and behavioral feature sequence. Experiments are based on three years of data from an Practice Communities, constructing a knowledge graph containing member nodes and 15293 relation edges. The average node degree is 10.74, the network density is 0.0038, and the clustering coefficient reaches 0.52, indicating that the community exhibits obvious smallworld characteristics. The results showed that the role classification module divided members into five roles: latent observers, casual participants, active contributors, domain experts, and entrepreneurial mentors, with a classification accuracy of 87.3%. Evolutionary trajectory analysis tracked the complete growth process of 217 members who eventually became entrepreneurial mentors, experiencing an average of 4.2 role transitions.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
B. Hutchins and R. Boyle, “A Community of Practice,” Changing Sports Journalism Practice in the Age of Digital Media, pp. 4-20, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9780429344886-2.
The Community of Practice, “Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design,” 2022:181-201, doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7130-9.ch008.
K. Smyth, “The LD4D community of practice,” Bulletin de lOIE, 2021, doi: 10.20506/bull.2021.1.3265.
Redactie, “IPOS als Community of Practice,” Onderwijs En Gezondheidszorg, vol. 44, pp. 11-11, 2020, doi: 10.24078/oeng.2020.10.126033.
J. Mcdonald and M. Mercieca B, “What Is a Community of Practice? 2021,”, doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-6354-0_1.
L. Sun, Z. Tao, Y. Li, et al., “ODA: Observation-Driven Agent for integrating LLMs and Knowledge Graphs,” 2024, doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.442.
R. Slavin, R. Williams, and C. Zimmermann, “Building a Community of Practice,” Activating the Art Museum, pp. 167-174, 2023, doi: 10.5771/9781538158555-167.
A. Kraemer and D. Steider, “Building a Community of Practice,” Sharing Less Commonly Taught Languages in Higher Education, pp. 233-246, 2023, doi: 10.4324/9781003349631-22.
C. Yu, “Narrative community in a community of practice,” Online Collaborative Translation in China and Beyond, pp. 61-84, 2022, doi: 10.4324/9781003024200-4.
E. Mccoll and N. Wilson, “Community of practice and Royal Assent,” Dental Update, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 455-456, 2024, doi: 10.12968/denu.2024.51.7.455.