Evaluation Method and Empirical Analysis of the Achievement of Ideological and Political Education Goals in Digital Teaching Scenarios
Main Article Content
Abstract
In digital and intelligent teaching scenarios, the goals of ideological and political education in courses face the dilemma of being “implicit and difficult to reveal, difficult to trace the process, and difficult to evaluate the effectiveness.” Traditional assessments struggle to dynamically capture the evolution of students’ ideological and political literacy. To address this, this paper proposes a method for assessing achievement by integrating multimodal process data. First, the three-dimensional goals of “cognitive identification—emotional internalization—behavioral practice” are deconstructed, and multi-source data mapping rules are established. Next, improved fuzzy hierarchical analysis is introduced for weight self-calibration, and an emotional temporal attention network is designed to extract deep emotional evolution features. Finally, a dynamic quantitative model is constructed based on evidence-based reasoning to achieve interpretable attribution. Experiments show that this method achieves a Kappa score of 0.92 with expert evaluation, and the three-dimensional internal reliability Cronbach’s α is higher than 0.80. The correlation coefficient between process assessment and final exam scores (0.78) is superior to that of traditional questionnaires (0.44), and the attribution accuracy is 85%. Ablation experiments confirm the key role of multimodal integration and emotional temporal mechanisms. This method provides an effective technical path for the process evaluation of ideological and political education in courses.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Y. Hou and J. Qian, “The current status, evaluation, and innovation of course ideological and political research,” Journal of Jiangsu University (Social Sciences Edition), vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 66–76, 2021, doi: 10.13317/j.cnki.jdskxb.2021.59.
C. Walkington, M. J. Nathan, W. Huang, J. Hunnicutt, and J. Washington, “Multimodal analysis of interaction data from embodied education technologies,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2565–2584, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11423-023-10254-9.
Y. Wu, “Construction of a quality evaluation model for ideological and political education in higher education courses based on student perception,” Vocational Education Development, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 324–335, 2025, doi: 10.12677/ve.2025.141048.
Y. Sun, H. Cao, and X. Yuan, “Research on the construction of evaluation index system for ideological and political education in science and engineering courses,” Journal of Jiangsu University (Social Sciences Edition), vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 77–88, 2021, doi: 10.13317/j.cnki.jdskxb.2021.60.
H. Zhou and M. Wang, “Research on the evaluation system of graduate course ideological and political education based on CIPP model and AHP,” Education Progress, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1565–1570, 2024, doi: 10.12677/ae.2024.1471344.
L. Huang, T. Doleck, B. Chen, X. Huang, C. Tan, S. P. Lajoie, and M. Wang, “Multimodal learning analytics for assessing teachers’ self-regulated learning in planning technology-integrated lessons in a computer-based environment,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 15823–15843, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11804-7.
A. Yusuf, N. M. Noor, and S. Bello, “Using multimodal learning analytics to model students’ learning behavior in animated programming classroom,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 6947–6990, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12079-8.
J. Shen, H. Yang, J. Li, and Z. Cheng, “Assessing learning engagement based on facial expression recognition in MOOC’s scenario,” Multimedia Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 469–478, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00530-021-00854-x.
X. Tang, Y. Gong, Y. Xiao, J. Xiong, and L. Bao, “Facial expression recognition for probing students’ emotional engagement in science learning,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 13–30, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10956-024-10143-7.
Z. Chen, M. Liang, Z. Xue, et al., “STRAN: Student expression recognition based on spatio-temporal residual attention network in classroom teaching videos,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 53, no. 21, pp. 25310–25329, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10489-023-04858-0.