A Thai Spoken Dialogue Generation System Incorporating Generative Adversarial Networks

Main Article Content

Y. Mansha

Abstract

Traditional Thai dialogue generation systems, under maximum likelihood training, often favor high-frequency "safe" sentence structures, resulting in monotonous style and poor multi-turn contextual coherence. Similar problems exist in automated quality control within the textile industry: traditional models, trained on large amounts of defect-free data, struggle to distinguish subtle or rare defects, and are difficult to capture long-range dependencies in multi-sensor data streams. This paper proposes a Thai spoken dialogue generation system based on RelGAN and Transformer. It captures multi-turn context through a segmented relative position self-attention encoder and segmented recurrent memory, while the decoder embeds a relational memory module to track dialogue states and long-term entity slots, simultaneously generating text and prosodic markers. The generated results are prosodic mapped using FastSpeech2 and synthesized into high-fidelity speech using HiFi-GAN. Experiments show that the system achieves a Distinct-2 score of 0.11, an intent retention rate of 97.5%, an average response time of 98.44 ms, and a MOS of 4.05. This method has significant potential for cross-industry applications, enabling the construction of highly consistent real-time diagnostic systems in the textile industry, processing continuous multi-cycle sensor data, and achieving rapid fault identification and feedback.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mansha, Y. (2026). A Thai Spoken Dialogue Generation System Incorporating Generative Adversarial Networks. Advanced Electromagnetics, 15(3), 4523–4538. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.3523
Section
Research Articles

References

T. Chen, “Design and Application of English Oral Online Dialogue System Based on Reinforcement Learning Algorithm,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 716–723, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.325.

View Article

S. Bibauw, W. Van den Noortgate, T. Francois, and P. Desmet, “Dialogue systems for language learning: A meta-analysis,” Language Learning & Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73488.

View Article

M. H. Hsu, P. S. Chen, and C. S. Yu, “Proposing a task-oriented chatbot system for EFL learners speaking practice,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 4297–4308, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1960864.

View Article

C. Zhai and S. Wibowo, “A WGAN-based dialogue system for embedding humor, empathy, and cultural aspects in education,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71940–71952, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294966.

View Article

A. C. Le and V. N. Huynh, “Enhancing conversational model with deep reinforcement learning and adversarial learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75955–75970, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297652.

View Article

M. Firdaus, N. Thangavelu, A. Ekbal, and P. Bhattacharyya, “I enjoy writing and playing, do you?: A personalized and emotion grounded dialogue agent using generative adversarial network,” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 2127–2138, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3155105.

View Article

M. Firdaus, A. Madasu, and A. Ekbal, “A unified framework for slot based response generation in a multimodal dialogue system,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 11643–11667, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15915-8.

View Article

A. Fuad and M. Al-Yahya, “AraConv: Developing an Arabic task-oriented dialogue system using multi-lingual transformer model mT5,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1881–1896, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041881.

View Article

X. Li, T. Liu, L. Zhang, F. Alqahtani, and A. Tolba, “A transformer-BERT integrated model-based automatic conversation method under English context,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55757–55767, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3388100.

View Article

Y. Zhao, B. Cheng, Y. Huang, and Z. Wan, “FluGCF: a fluent dialogue generation model with coherent concept entity flow,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 853–867, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2023.3340610.

View Article

K. Manohar and R. Rajan, “Improving speech recognition systems for the morphologically complex Malayalam language using subword tokens for language modeling,” EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, vol. 2023, no. 1, pp. 47–71, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13636-023-00313-7.

View Article

M. Bhadri, “BiLSTMs and BPE for English to Telugu CLIR,” J. Electrical Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2022–2029, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.1798.

View Article

Y. Qiu, L. Dong, W. Zhang, H. Xing, and J. Huang, “A diffusion enhanced CRF and BiLSTM framework for accurate entity recognition,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04036-x.

View Article

Z. Sun and X. Li, “Named entity recognition model based on feature fusion,” Information, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 133–145, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/info14020133.

View Article

D. Mazitov, I. Alimova, and E. Tutubalina, “Named entity recognition in Russian using multi-task LSTM-CRF,” Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 273, no. 4, pp. 595–604, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-023-06521-y.

View Article

H. Zhang, H. Song, S. Li, M. Zhou, and D. Song, “A survey of controllable text generation using transformer-based pre-trained language models,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1–37, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3617680.

View Article

M. Thakkar and N. N. Pise, “Leveraging Transformer-based Pretrained Language model for Task-oriented dialogue system,” International Journal of Computers, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2023.

K. Nassiri and M. Akhloufi, “Transformer models used for text-based question answering systems,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 10602–10635, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04052-8.

View Article

A. Rahali and M. A. Akhloufi, “End-to-end transformer-based models in textual-based NLP,” Ai, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 54–110, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4010004.

View Article

S. Lafkiar and N. En Nahnahi, “An end-to-end transformer-based model for Arabic question generation,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 84, no. 20, pp. 22009–22023, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19958-3.

View Article

R. Bhat and R. Nanjundegowda, “A review on comparative analysis of generative adversarial networks’ architectures and applications,” Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v6i1.24160.

View Article

C. Shao, Z. Ma, M. Zhang, and Y. Feng, “Beyond mle: Convex learning for text generation,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 8913–8936, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.52202/075280-0391.

View Article

J. Xu, X. Liu, J. Yan, D. Cai, H. Li, and J. Li, “Learning to break the loop: Analyzing and mitigating repetitions for neural text generation,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 3082–3095, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.52202/068431-0223.

View Article

I. A. M. Huijben, W. Kool, M. B. Paulus, and R. J. G. Van Sloun, “A review of the gumbel-max trick and its extensions for discrete stochasticity in machine learning,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 1353–1371, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3157042.

View Article

I. Alsmadi, N. Aljaafari, M. Nazzal, S. Alhamed, A. H. Sawalmeh, C. P. Vizcarra, et al., “Adversarial machine learning in text processing: a literature survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17043–17077, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3146405.

View Article

M. Reyad, A. M. Sarhan, and M. Arafa, “A modified Adam algorithm for deep neural network optimization,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 35, no. 23, pp. 17095–17112, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08568-z.

View Article

H. Kabiri, Y. Ghanou, H. Khalifi, and G. Casalino, “AMAdam: adaptive modifier of Adam method,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 3427–3458, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-023-02052-9.

View Article

C. Zhang, Y. Shao, H. Sun, L. Xing, Q. Zhao, and L. Zhang, “The WuC-Adam algorithm based on joint improvement of Warmup and cosine annealing algorithms,” Math. Biosci. Eng, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1270–1285, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024054.

View Article

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.