Social Security Fund (SSF) holding and ESG performance
Main Article Content
Abstract
Compared with other institutional investors, social security funds pursue stable returns, maintain relatively high independence, and exert a certification effect on firms in their portfolios. Using Chinese Shanghai-Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2021 as samples, this paper empirically examines the impact of social security fund holdings on enterprise ESG performance. The results show that social security funds improve ESG performance through corporate governance, incremental financing flexibility, and external pressure. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the impact is stronger when market competition, government environmental regulation, and regional digital-economy development are high. The findings provide evidence that long-term public capital supports the stable development of the capital market and green investment, including advanced communication infrastructure and energy- saving technology sectors.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Q. Jin, Y. Xuan, G. Li, et al., “Social Security Fund Holdings and Corporate Dividend Policies,” Accounting Research, no. 05, pp. 34–39, 2016.
C. Li, Y. Xue, and L. Hui, “Social Security Fund Holdings and Corporate Earnings Quality: Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies,” Financial Research, no. 07, pp. 124–142, 2018.
H. Yang, D. Wei, and J. Sun, “Can Institutional Investor Ownership Improve the Quality of Accounting Information in Listed Companies? With a Discussion on Differences Among Different Types of Institutional Investors,” Accounting Research, no. 09, pp. 16–23, 96, 2012.
J. A. Brickley, R. C. Lease, and C. W. Smith, “Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 267–291, 1988.
M. C. Jensen, “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 831–880, 1993.
X. Chen, J. Harford, and K. Li, “Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 86, pp. 279–305, 2007.
W. Sun, J. Feng, and B. Qi, “Social Security Fund Holdings and Stock Price Crash Risk,” Financial Science, no. 09, pp. 17–29, 2022.
X. Deng, W. Li, and X. Ren, “More Sustainable, More Productive: Evidence from ESG Ratings and Total Factor Productivity Among Listed Chinese Firms,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 51, Art. no. 103439, 2023.
E. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, R. Brooks, and H. X. Do, “ESG and Firm Performance: The Role of Size and Media Channels,” Economic Modelling, vol. 121, Art. no. 106203, 2023.
B. E. Ashforth and F. Mael, “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, pp. 20–39, 1989.
B. Bushee, “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior,” The Accounting Review, vol. 73, pp. 305–333, 1998.
E. Stockhammer, “Financialization and the Slowdown of Accumulation,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 28, pp. 719–741, 2004.
J. Xie, W. Nozawa, M. Yagi, H. Fujii, and S. Managi, “Do Environmental, Social, and Governance Activities Improve Corporate Financial Performance?,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 286– 300, 2018.
V. Di Norcia and J. T. Larkins, “Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 25, pp. 1–13, 2000.
X. Fang and D. Hu, “Enterprise ESG Performance and Innovation: Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies,” Economic Research, vol. 58, no. 02, pp. 91–106, 2023.
J. Tan, R. Huang, and J. Zhang, “ESG Performance and Enterprise Risk: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Resource Acquisition,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 05, pp. 3–18, 2022.
C. Li, Y. Xue, and L. Hui, “Social Security Fund and Corporate Earnings Quality: Evidence from China?,” Journal of Financial Research, no. 457, pp. 312–331, 2018.
R. Shen and X. Song, “Social Security Fund Holdings and Enterprise Financialization,” Finance and Economics, no. 02, pp. 68–79, 2023.
G. Jin and Z. Huang, “On the Corporate Governance Effect of Social Security Funds,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 58, Art. no. 104035, 2023.
S. Bansal and H. Singh, “Does Market Competition Foster Related Party Transactions? Evidence from Emerging Market,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 77, Art. no. 101909, 2023.
H. A. Haveman, “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Organizational Change and Performance under Conditions of Fundamental Environmental Transformation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 48– 75, 1992.
P. C. Godfrey, “The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 777–798, 2005.
Z. Liu, Y. Tang, J. Wilson, et al., “Influence of Government Attention on Environmental Quality: An Analysis of 30 Provinces in China,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 100, Art. no. 107084, 2023.
L. Liang and Y. Li, “How Does Government Support Promote Digital Economy Development in China? The Mediating Role of Regional Innovation Ecosystem Resilience,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 188, Art. no. 122328, 2023.
J. Lu, Q. Xiao, and T. Wang, “Does the Digital Economy Generate a Gender Dividend for Female Employment? Evidence from China,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 47, no. 6, Art. no. 102545, 2023.