Automatic Assessment Model for Chinese-English Scientific Translation Quality Based on Contrastive Learning

Main Article Content

R. B. Hu

Abstract

Assessing the quality of scientific literature translation remains challenging because of strong subjectivity, dense domain-specific terminology, and the limited availability of standardized reference translations. These issues are particularly relevant for the international dissemination of research in advanced electromagnetic engineering, where precise multilingual communication supports the reliable exchange of knowledge on electromagnetic waves, antennas, and propagation technologies. This paper proposes a Contrastive Learning-based Chinese-English Scientific Translation Quality Evaluation model (C-TQE). By constructing multi-level positive and negative sample pairs, the model learns the relative ordinal relationships of translation quality within a shared representation space. A dual-encoder architecture encodes source sentences and candidate translations through a shared pre-trained language model, while a contrastive loss function draws high-quality translations closer to the source representation and separates low-quality ones. To address the characteristics of scientific texts, a term-aware negative sampling strategy exploits domain dictionaries and syntactic structures to generate semantically similar but terminologically incorrect examples. Experiments on 11, 238 human-annotated instances from the WMT20–22 Chinese-English scientific translation tasks show that C-TQE achieves a Kendall’s tau correlation coefficient of 0.564 with human judgments, outperforming COMET (0.512) and BLEURT (0.497). Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of term-aware negative sampling and the contrastive learning objective, while diagnostic analysis demonstrates high consistency in evaluating terminological accuracy and syntactic structures. The proposed framework provides an effective solution for large-scale scientific translation quality assessment and facilitates the accurate international communication of multidisciplinary engineering research, including electromagnetic and antenna-related studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hu, R. B. (2026). Automatic Assessment Model for Chinese-English Scientific Translation Quality Based on Contrastive Learning. Advanced Electromagnetics, 15(3), 3110–3120. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.3369
Section
Research Articles

References

M. Karpinska, N. Raj, K. Thai, et al., “DEMETR: Diagnosing Evaluation Metrics for Translation,” Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 9540-9561, 2022, doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.649.

View Article

S. Gu and Y. Feng, “Research on Continuous Learning of Multilingual Neural Machine Translation Based on Parameter Allocation,” Journal of Chinese Information Processing, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 77-84, 2025, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0077.2025.04.007.

View Article

X. Qu, G. Liu, and L. Li, “Multi-scale Joint Learning with Negative Sample Mining for Non-autoregressive Machine Translation,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 322, Art. no. 113610, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113610.

View Article

M. Zufle, V. Zouhar, and T. A. Dinh, “COMET-poly: Machine Translation Metric Grounded in Other Candidates,” Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Machine Translation. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 887-904, 2025, doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.wmt-1.63.

View Article

J. Wang, “Research and Construction of Automatic Scoring Models for Chinese Students Chinese-to-English Translation Based on Different Styles,” Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, ISBN: 9787521358155, 2024.

M. Chopra, L. Sparrenberg, and R. Sifa, “SynCED-EnDe 2025: A Synthetic and Curated English-German Dataset for Critical Error Detection in Machine Translation,” arXiv preprint. arXiv:2510.05144, 2025.

T. Gao, X. Yao, and D. Chen, “SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings,” Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 6894-6910, 2021, doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.552.

View Article

Evaluating Terminology Translation in Machine Translation Systems via Metamorphic Testing, “2024 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST),” IEEE, pp. 1-12, 2024.

Tongyi Lab, “WMT English-to-Chinese Machine Translation News Test Set,” ModelScope, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://www.modelscope.cn/datasets/damo/WMT-English-to-Chinese-Machine-Translation-newstest.git.

View Article

Q. Wang, “Evaluating Uighur literary translation: A comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Translate, and Bing Translator,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 10, Art. no. e0335261, 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335261.

View Article

X. Zheng, H. Chen, Y. Ma, et al., “Neural Machine Translation Model Fusing Dependency Syntax and LSTM,” Journal of Harbin University of Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 20-27, 2023, doi: 10.15938/j.jhust.2023.03.003.

View Article

R. Rei, C. Stewart, A. C. Farinha, et al., “Comet: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation,” Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2685-2702, 2020, doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.213.

View Article

T. Sellam, D. Das, and A. P. Parikh, “BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation,” 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 7881-7892, 2020, doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.704.

View Article

T. Ranasinghe, C. Orasan, and R. Mitkov, “TransQuest: Translation Quality Estimation with Cross-lingual Transformers,” 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 5070-5081, 2020, doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.445.

View Article

Y. Zheng and Y. Liu, “A Review of Machine Translation Quality Research,” English Square, vol. (23), pp. 40-43, 2025, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6167.2025.23.011.

View Article

N. Lin, “Research on Key Technologies of Multilingual Learning Based on Pre-trained Models,” Guangdong University of Technology, 2024, doi: 10.27029/d.cnki.ggdgu.2024.000095.

View Article

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.