Game Strategy for Low-Carbon Investment by Electric Power Enterprises under the Dual Drivers of Carbon Quota Mechanism and Blockchain Technology
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates low-carbon investment strategies in power supply chains under the combined influence of carbon quota mechanisms (CQM) and blockchain technology (BCT). A two-echelon system consisting of a power generator and an electricity retailer is modeled, and four decision scenarios are constructed by considering blockchain adoption under both the grandfathering method (GFM) and benchmarking method (BMM). A Stackelberg game framework is employed to analyze the interactions among low-carbon technology investment, low-carbon electricity promotion, market demand, and enterprise profitability. Results show that the BMM consistently induces higher low-carbon investment levels, stronger market demand, and greater retailer profitability than the GFM, regardless of blockchain adoption. Furthermore, blockchain-enabled information traceability exhibits a significant threshold effect: when implementation costs remain below a critical level, trusted information transmission enhances consumer green trust, stimulates demand for low-carbon electricity, and improves the economic performance of supply-chain participants. Sensitivity analysis further demonstrates that consumer green trust, low-carbon preference, and responsiveness to low-carbon promotion positively influence both emissionreduction efforts and enterprise profitability, whereas excessive blockchain deployment costs weaken these benefits. The proposed framework provides a quantitative methodology for analyzing information-enabled lowcarbon decision making and coordinated investment strategies in modern power systems.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
H. Nasiri, M. Asadian Ghahfarokhi, M. Ghodsi Hassanabad, and A. Bahmanpour, “Reducing oil spills created by explosions in seabed pipelines with innovative coatings to protect marine ecosystems,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 13631-13644, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s13762-025-06643-7.
L. Guo, M. Cui, Qu, Y, et al., “2024,” An integrated approach to modeling the influence of critical factors in low-carbon technology adoption by chemical enterprises in China. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 373, Art. no. 123834, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123834.
P. Li, X. Ma, D. Liu, Y. Wei, P. Li, H. Hou, et al., “A microbiome abundant environment remodels the intestinal 5379 microbiota and improves resistance to obesity induced by chlorpyrifos in mice,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 315, Art. no. 120415, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120415.
H. Y. Wu, Y. F. Chen, and Y. Chang, “Integrating work into life helps reduce residential green-house gas emissions,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 351, Art. no. 119974, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119974.
Z. Zhou, Z. Wu, C. Liu, et al., “The path to carbon neutral shipping: A comparative analysis of low carbon technologies,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 159, pp. 606-616, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2025.04.034.
L. Tang and X. Luo, “Contract signing and low-carbon technology adoption in rice production: survey evidence from China,” Environmental Development, vol. 57, Art. no. 101339, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101339.
P. Mozumder, W. F. Vásquez, and A. Marathe, “Consumers’ preference for renewable energy in the southwest USA,” Energy Economics, vol. 33, pp. 1119-1126, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.003.
Y. Bai, K. Fan, K. Zhang, et al., “Blockchain based trust management for agricultural green supply: A game theoretic approach,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 310, Art. no. 127407, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127407.
J. Y. Sun, Y. Y. Lu, and C. X. Teng, “A study on the impact of blockchain technology on the cooperative strategy of low carbon supply chain,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 10, pp. 1-15, 2024.
Z. B. Li, F. Deng, Q. Q. Zhu, et al., “Do the Chinese government’s efforts to make a low-carbon industrial transition hinder or promote the economic development? evidence from low-carbon industrial parks pilot policy,” Sustainability, vol. 15, pp. 77, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su15010077.
X. Y. Yu, Z. M. Wu, Q. W. Wang, et al., “Exploring the investment strategy of power enterprises under the nationwide carbon emissions trading mechanism: A scenario-based system dynamics approach,” Energy Policy, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111409.
K. Y. Li, J. Yang, and Y. T. Wei, “Impacts of carbon markets and subsidies on carbon capture and storage retrofitting of existing coal-fired units in China,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 326, Art. no. 116824, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116824.
C. Y. Ji, Z. K. Tan, B. J. Chen, et al., “The impact of environmental policies on renewable energy investment decisions in the power supply chain,” Energy Policy, vol. 186, Art. no. 113987, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.113987.
Z. M. Liu, M. Q. Li, E. Virguez, et al., “Low-Carbon transition pathways of power systems for Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau region in China,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 17, pp. 307-322, 2024, doi: 10.1039/D3EE02181E.
Q. L. Tan, H. Y. Lv, J. Han, et al., “How do hybrid price signals from the spot market and carbon emission trading market affect power generation investment? An empirical study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,” Energy, vol. 333, Art. no. 137299, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137299.
W. Chen, X. Xia, L. M. Zhang, et al., “Impact of carbon misreporting on renewable energy investment strategies of regulated power enterprises under cap-and-trade mechanism,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2025, doi: 10.1080/01605682.2025.2525946.
W. Chen, L. F. Zhang, and H. Y. Du, “Impact of cap-and-trade mechanisms on investments in renew-able energy and marketing effort,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 28, pp. 1333-1342, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.010.
Y. Zhou, X. G. Zhao, and L. Xu, “Supply side incentive under the renewable portfolio standards: A perspective of China,” Renewable Energy, vol. 193, pp. 505-518, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.046.
Y. Y. Chi, H. Zhao, Y. Hu, et al., “The impact of allocation methods on carbon emission trading under electricity marketization reform in China: A system dynamics analysis,” Energy, vol. 259, Art. no. 125034, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125034.
Z. Li, Y. S. Tian, S. L. Li, et al., “Exploration on the scientific rationality of low-carbon investment projects from the perspective of supply chain: A case study of CS thermal power plant,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29602-6.
W. Chen, Y. K. Ma, and C. G. Bai, “The impact of carbon emission quota allocation regulations on the investment of low-carbon technology in electric power industry under peak-valley price policy,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 71, pp. 374-391, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3121002.
W. Chen, R. N. Zhu, J. Chen, et al., “Impacts of carbon tax policies on low-carbon technology investment in the electricity supply chain under peak-valley pricing,” EEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 72, pp. 3151-3165, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2025.3589549.
C. H. Ju, Z. H. Shen, F. G. Bao, et al., “A novel credible carbon footprint traceability system for low carbon economy using blockchain technology,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, Art. no. 10316, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610316.
C. G. Mu, T. Ding, M. Yang, et al., “Peer-to-Peer energy trading based on a hybrid blockchain system,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 124-128, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.123.
S. L. Chai, X. C. Zhang, M. Z. Abedin, et al., “An optimized GRT model with blockchain digital smart contracts 5381 for power generation enterprises,” Energy Economics, vol. 128, Art. no. 107153, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107153.
L. Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. H. Li, et al., “P2P trading mode for real-time coupled electricity and carbon markets based on a new indicator green energy,” Energy, vol. 285, Art. no. 129179, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129179.
S. M. Guo and T. T. Feng, “Blockchain-Based smart trading mechanism for renewable energy power consumption vouchers and green certificates: Platform design and simulation,” Applied Energy, vol. 369, Art. no. 123351, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123351.
S. Y. Zhang, X. X. Zheng, F. Jia, et al., “Pricing strategy and blockchain technology investment under hybrid carbon trading schemes: A biform game analysis,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 63, pp. 5336-5357, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2398582.
J. C. Liu and Y. Y. Lu, “A task matching model of photovoltaic storage system under the energy blockchain environment-based on GA-CLOUD-GS algorithm,” Energy, vol. 283, Art. no. 129066, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129066.
W. Chen, J. J. Luo, K. Govindan, et al., “Impact of carbon quota policy on clean energy investment strategies with financial constraints,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 277, Art. no. 109378, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109378.
X. Y. Shi, H. Xiao, W. F. Liu, et al., “Confronting the carbon footprint challenge of blockchain,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 57, pp. 1403-1410, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05165.
Y. Yu, K. You, S. Zhang, et al., “A city-level assessment framework for low-carbon transition of residential district heating in China,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 225, Art. no. 108576, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108576.
C. Sheng, J. Cheng, G. Wang, et al., “Carbon footprint portraits for multimodal trip chains in the context of mobility as a service,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 117, Art. no. 108179, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108179.
B. Zhou, T. L. Wang, H. Yu, et al., “Spatiotemporal evolution of tourism ecological security alerts: Evaluation and trend prediction,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 27, pp. 1-22, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-04202-z. APPENDIX A. Summary of equil Table librium strategies. e A.1.