The Implications of the Party’s Self-Revolution for Governance Innovation in Textile Enterprises
Main Article Content
Abstract
The spirit of the Party’s self-revolution provides important guidance for governance innovation in textile enterprises. Marx’s statement in Capital that “the relations of production must adapt to the development of productive forces” reveals the internal law that corporate governance systems must evolve with the times. As an important part of traditional advantageous industries, textile enterprises currently face problems such as outdated governance concepts, insufficient power supervision, imbalanced talent structures, and inadequate digital transformation. Based on the spirit of self-revolution, this article systematically discusses practical strategies for governance innovation in textile enterprises through four paths: self-innovation, power constraint, talent drive, and digital transformation. The analysis emphasizes that textile enterprises should reshape governance culture, strengthen checks and balances, optimize talent systems, and use digital tools to improve transparency, supervision, and decision-making efficiency. The study provides theoretical support and practical guidance for improving governance capacity and promoting high-quality development in the textile industry.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
K. I. Beck, “Dissecting the Pillars of China’s Economy: The Role, Governance and Diversity of State-Owned Enterprises,” Business and Policy Challenges of Global Uncertainty, pp. 19-47, 2025, doi: 10.1142/9781800616226_0002.
OECD, “Ownership and Governance of State-Owned Enterprises,” 2021, doi: 10.1787/581de09d-en.
L. Zhinan and J. Wu, “Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Finance Path for the Governance of Zombie Enterprises,” 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4726326.
R. Lin and J. J. Chen, “Path and Characteristics of the Multinational Governance of Chinese Enterprises,” The Theory and Application of Multinational Corporate Governance. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-7703-8_9.
Z. Zhang, L. Zhang, and A. Xiong, “The influence of non-state-owned shareholder governance on the governance level of state-owned enterprises–Based on the perspective of board resolution behavior and party organization governance,” PLoS ONE (v.1;2006), vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 27, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301788.
J. Xi and Y. Liu, “Modernization of Governance System and Governance Capability of State-Owned Enterprises,” 2021; 004(004):159-165.
J. Liang and H. Zhao, “Research on Equity Governance of Scientific and Technological Innovation Enterprises,” Journal of Statistics and Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2024, doi: 10.62517/jse.202411101.
V. K. S. Anil and A. B. Babatope, “The role of data governance in enhancing cybersecurity resilience for global enterprises,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1420-1432, 2024, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.3171.
L. He, “Research on the spillover effect of digital governance capability innovation among enterprises in the supply chain,” Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 58-70, 2025, doi: 10.54254/2977-5701/2025.22751.
H. Jiaping, “The collaborative strategy of data governance of state-owned enterprises in China,” SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 163, Art. no. 03038, 2023, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/202316303038.
Y. Chen, “The Value Effect of ESG Performance and Corporate Governance Innovation in Chinese Enterprises under High-Quality Development,” Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 99-104, 2024, doi: 10.54254/2754-1169/119/20242367.
J. Gudo, “Corporate Governance in State-Owned Enterprises,” Civil Society Organisations and State-Owned Enterprises in South Africa, pp. 44-63, 2024, doi: 10.4324/9781003390701-3.
M. Aiken, “The role of social enterprises in local democratic governance,” The Preston Model and Community Wealth Building. New York, NY, USA: Routledge; 2021, doi: 10.4324/9781003053736-10.
X. Jin, L. Xu, Y. Xin, and A. Adhikari, “Political governance in China’s state-owned enterprises,” China Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 15(2), 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100236.
M. A. Nuez, E. Villanueva, L. Giraldo, L. Gomez, and Y. Castaño, “Risk governance in the textile/clothing industry: A case study in medium enterprises,” Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, vol. 6, no. 2, Art. no. 25191, 2023, doi: 10.55267/djfm/14137.