Using GAT Structure to Analyze the Propagation Efficiency of Technology Skills Transfer Networks Among Students in Industry-Academia Collaboration
Main Article Content
Abstract
Current studies on technology skills transfer mainly rely on static network models, which have limited capability to characterize the dynamic influence of student heterogeneity on transfer pathways, especially in highly specialized and practice-oriented disciplines. This limitation reduces the accuracy of identifying key skills and efficient propagation paths, thereby constraining precision-oriented industry– academia collaborative training. To address this issue, this paper proposes a Graph Attention Network (GAT)-based framework for analyzing technology skill transfer efficiency. Based on the real learning trajectories of 328 intelligent manufacturing students, a student–skill bipartite network is constructed and projected into a temporally constrained directed transfer graph to preserve the sequential and directional characteristics of skill acquisition. A two-layer GAT with a multi-head attention mechanism is then employed to dynamically learn transfer weights among skills, enabling the identification of asymmetric transfer patterns and heterogeneous learning preferences across different student backgrounds. Experimental results demonstrate a Hit@3 prediction accuracy of 78.4%, while high-propagation skills are primarily concentrated in composite competencies such as system integration and fault diagnosis. The proposed framework establishes an interpretable closed loop integrating dynamic attention modeling, propagation efficiency quantification, and educational intervention, providing measurable and operational support for curriculum optimization and personalized training. Moreover, the graph-based propagation modeling strategy offers methodological insights for intelligent information propagation and graph signal representation in complex engineering systems, with potential relevance to advanced electromagnetic information processing and interdisciplinary learning networks.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
H. Zhang, “The Intrinsic Logic and Practical Pathways of Empowering Vocational Education Through Industry-Education Integration: Summary of the Session on Industry-Education Integration for Advancing High-Quality Vocational Education,” World Vocational and Technical Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38-54, 2025.
K. Hötte, “Skill transferability and the stability of transition pathways-A learning-based explanation for patterns of diffusion,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 959-993, 2021.
C. D. Driver and M. J. Tomasik, “Formalizing complex developmental phenomena as continuous-time systems: Learning gains in multiple domains,” Child Development, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1454-1471, 2023.
P. Bilancia, J. Schmidt, R. Raffaeli, M. Peruzzini, and M. Pellicciari, “An overview of industrial robots control and programming approaches,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2582, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13042582.
R. Mahajan, P. Gupta, and R. Misra, “Employability skills framework: A tripartite approach,” Education+ Training, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 360-379, 2022, doi: 10.1108/ET-12-2020-0367.
P. Wan, X. Wang, Y. Lin, and G. Pang, “A knowledge diffusion model in autonomous learning under multiple networks for personalized educational resource allocation,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 430-444, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2021.3103006.
F. Peng and L. Guo, “Personalized learning path planning and optimization methods of vocational education combined with DQN,” Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 3780-3792, 2025, doi: 10.1177/14727978251323112.
D. C. Kavargyris, K. Georgiou, N. Mittas, and L. Angelis, “Extracting knowledge and highly demanded skills from European Union educational policies: A network analysis approach,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-41, 2025.
C. Cao, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Lu, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “Co-occurrence matters: Learning action relation for temporal action localization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 3327-3339, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2023.3321508.
A. Usta, I. S. Altingovde, R. Ozcan, and Ö. Ulusoy, “Learning to rank for educational search engines,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 211-225, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2021.3075196.
H. Li, F. Cao, and W. Dai, “Major-based undergraduate curriculum as an obstacle to graduate employability development,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 705-719, 2024, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2023.2258844.
A. A. Mubarak, H. Cao, I. M. Hezam, and F. Hao, “Modeling students’ performance using graph convolutional networks,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2183-2201, 2022.
X. Li, G. Xiao, Y. Chen, Z. Tang, W. Jiang, and K. Li, “An explicitly weighted gcn aggregator based on temporal and popularity features for recommendation,” ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-23, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3587272.
Q. Zhang, K. Hua, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhao, and P. Chen, “Acnet: An attention– convolution collaborative semantic segmentation network on sensor-derived datasets for autonomous driving,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 4776, 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25154776.
X. Ouyang, L. Liu, W. Chen, C. Wang, X. Sun, C. He, and G. Liu, “Systematic risks of the global lithium supply chain network: From static topological structures to cascading failure dynamics,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 58, no. 50, pp. 22135-22147, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c10523.
Q. Huang and J. Chen, “Enhancing academic performance prediction with temporal graph networks for massive open online courses,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 52, 2024.
M. Saqr and S. López-Pernas, “The curious case of centrality measures: A large-scale empirical investigation,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13-31, 2022, doi: 10.18608/jla.2022.7415.
G. Kaur, B. Singh, R. S. Batth, and R. Garg, “BATFE: Design of a hybrid bioinspired model for adaptive traffic flow control in edge devices,” Microsystem Technologies, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1987-2002, 2025.
Y. Zhang, R. An, S. Liu, J. Cui, and X. Shang, “Predicting and understanding student learning performance using multi-source sparse attention convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Big Data, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 118-132, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TBDATA.2021.3125204.
J. Engle and C. M. Walker, “Thinking counterfactually supports children’s evidence evaluation in causal learning,” Child Development, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1636-1651, 2021, doi: 10.1111/cdev.13518.
R. van der Velden, I. Bijlsma, M. C. Fregin, and M. Levels, “Are general skills important for vocationally educated?,” Acta Sociologica, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 387-405, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00016993231219135.
Y. J. Wang, C. L. Gao, and X. D. Ye, “A data-driven precision teaching intervention mechanism to improve secondary school students’ learning effectiveness,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 11645-11673, 2024.
J. G. Karstensen, L. J. Nayahangan, L. Konge, and P. Vilmann, “A core curriculum for basic EUS skills: An international consensus using the Delphi methodology,” Endoscopic Ultrasound, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 122-132, 2022, doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00125.
Ó. Cuéllar, M. Contero, and M. Hincapié, “Personalized and Timely Feedback in Online Education: Enhancing Learning with Deep Learning and Large Language Models,” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 45, 2025, doi: 10.3390/mti9050045.
Y. Xu, S. Sun, H. Zhang, C. Yi, Y. Miao, D. Yang, et al., “Time-aware graph embedding: A temporal smoothness and task-oriented approach,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1-23, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3480243.
G. Zhu, Y. Chen, and S. Wang, “Graph-community-enabled personalized course-job recommendations with cross-domain data integration,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 7439, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14127439.
M. Yang, Z. Li, Y. Gao, C. He, F. Huang, and W. Chen, “Heterogeneous graph attention networks for depression identification by campus cyber-activity patterns,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 3493-3503, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2023.3343689.
T. Dash, A. Srinivasan, and A. Baskar, “Inclusion of domain-knowledge into GNNs using mode-directed inverse entailment,” Machine Learning, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 575-623, 2022.
D. Yan, S. Bao, Z. Zhang, J. Sun, and M. Zhou, “Leveraging pharmacovigilance data to predict population-scale toxicity profiles of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 207-220, 2025.
X. Mo, Z. Huang, Y. Xing, and C. Lv, “Multi-agent trajectory prediction with heterogeneous edge-enhanced graph attention network,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 9554-9567, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3146300.
F. Yang, H. Zhang, and S. Tao, “Simplified multilayer graph convolutional networks with dropout,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 4776-4791, 2022.
R. W. Runhardt, “Concrete counterfactual tests for process tracing: Defending an interventionist potential outcomes framework,” Sociological Methods & Research, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1591-1628, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00491241221134523.
I. W. Jones, J. S. Bersson, J. Liu, K. Sharma, O. A. Vasilyev, T. A. Miller, et al., “Calculated and empirical values of vibronic transition dipole moments of reactive chemical intermediates for determination of concentrations,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 127, no. 21, pp. 4670-4681, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c01584.
G. Zare, N. Jafari, M. Hosseinzadeh, and A. Sahafi, “DAC-GCN: A Dual Actor-Critic Graph Convolutional Network with Multi-Hop Aggregation for Enhanced Recommender Systems,” Acta Informatica Pragensia, vol. 2025, no. 3, pp. 340-364, 2025, doi: 10.18267/j.aip.261.
F. Essam, H. El, and S. R. H. Ali, “A comparison of the pearson, spearman rank and kendall tau correlation coefficients using quantitative variables,” Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 36-48, 2022, doi: 10.9734/AJPAS/2022/v20i3425.