Transformer-Based Adaptive System for Graded Reading Difficulty in Vocational College English
Main Article Content
Abstract
Accurate difficulty a ssessment o f t echnical E nglish d ocuments i s e ssential f or adaptive learning and intelligent information processing in engineering education, particularly for multilingual technical resources associated with electromagnetic systems and wireless communication applications. To address the limitations of conventional Transformer models in handling long documents with complex structures and domain-specific t erminology, t his s tudy p roposes a s tructure-aware a daptive reading difficulty a ssessment f ramework i ntegrating h ierarchical d ocument e ncoding, r andom-access long-text processing, terminology graph enhancement, and multi-task learning. Structural information from chapters, paragraphs, headings, and tables is explicitly incorporated into Transformer representations, while graph-enhanced professional terminology embeddings improve semantic understanding in specialized contexts. The model jointly predicts global and paragraph-level difficulty a nd c ombines l earner a bility modeling with dynamic recommendation strategies to achieve personalized reading adaptation. Experimental results demonstrate an overall difficulty p rediction a ccuracy o f 9 2.3% a nd t erminology r ecognition accuracy approaching 90%, outperforming conventional LSTM-based methods while maintaining efficient processing for long documents. The proposed framework provides an effective solution for intelligent graded reading and offers practical support for semantic understanding and adaptive management of technical documentation in electromagnetic engineering, wireless communication, and related multidisciplinary applications.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
D. Yapp, R. de Graaff, and H. van den Bergh, “Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students’ academic reading comprehension,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1456-1479, 2023, doi: 10.1177/1362168820985236.
R. Ivanova and A. Ivanov, “Online Reading Skills as an Object of Testing in International English Exams (IELTS, TOEFL, CAE),” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 713-732, 2021.
E. Bonner, R. Lege, and E. Frazier, “Large Language Model-Based Artificial Intelligence in the Language Classroom: Practical Ideas for Teaching,” Teaching English with Technology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 23-41, 2023.
M. Zulqarnain and M. Saqlain, “Text readability evaluation in higher education using CNNs,” Journal of Industrial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 184-193, 2023, doi: 10.56578/jii010305.
P. Bannister, A. Santamaría-Urbieta, and E. Alcalde-Peñalver, “A Delphi Study on Generative Artificial Intelligence and English Medium Instruction Assessment: Implications for Social Justice,” Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 53-80, 2023.
B. Markey, W. Brown D, M. Laudenbach, and A. Kohler, “Dense and disconnected: Analyzing the sedimented style of ChatGPT-generated text at scale,” Written Communication, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 571-600, 2024, doi: 10.1177/07410883241263528.
M. Mohsen, “Artificial intelligence in academic translation: A comparative study of large language models and Google Translate,” Psycholinguistics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 134-156, 2024, doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2024-35-2-134-156.
Y. Wang, J. Zhou, Z. Li, S. Zhang, and X. Han, “Automatically difficulty grading method for English reading corpus with multifeature embedding based on a pretrained language model,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 17, pp. 474-484, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2023.3319582.
J. H. Lee, D. Shin, and W. Noh, “Artificial intelligence-based content generator technology for young English-as-a-foreign-language learners’ reading enjoyment,” Relc Journal, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 508-516, 2023, doi: 10.1177/00336882231165060.
D. Agostini and F. Picasso, “Large language models for sustainable assessment and feedback in higher education: Towards a pedagogical and technological framework,” Intelligenza Artificiale, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 121-138, 2024, doi: 10.3233/IA-240033.
G. Jianan, R. Kehao, and G. Binwei, “Deep learning-based text knowledge classification for whole-process engineering consulting standards,” Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 61-71, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2023.07.011.
H. Majeed and S. Taha, “A comparative analysis of machine and AI translation quality: A case study in Kurdish-English translation,” Journal of Kurdistani for Strategic Studies (JKSS), vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 175-189, 2024.
G. Mischler, Y. A. Li, S. Bickel, A. D. Mehta, and N. Mesgarani, “Contextual feature extraction hierarchies converge in large language models and the brain,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1467-1477, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s42256-024-00925-4.
G. Venkateshwarlu, G. Sireesha, B. P. Reddy, and C. Yogender, “Transformer-Based Adaptive Examination Systems for Scalable, Accurate, and Personalized Assessments in Education,” Frontiers in Collaborative Research, vol. 2, no. 1s, pp. 10-19, 2024.
J. Hao, A. A. von Davier, V. Yaneva, S. Lottridge, M. von Davier, and D. J. Harris, “Transforming assessment: The impacts and implications of large language models and generative AI,” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 16-29, 2024, doi: 10.1111/emip.12602.
J. Mudkanna Gavhane and R. Pagare, “Artificial intelligence for education and its emphasis on assessment and adversity quotient: A review,” Education + Training, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 609-645, 2024, doi: 10.1108/ET-04-2023-0117.
M. U. Hadi, R. Qureshi, A. Shah, M. Irfan, A. Zafar, and Shaikh MB et al, “Large language models: a comprehensive survey of its applications, challenges, limitations, and future prospects,” Authorea preprints, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1-26, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11254-7.
M. Messer, N. C. C. Brown, M. Kölling, and M. Shi, “Automated grading and feedback tools for programming education: A systematic review,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-43, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3636515.
J. Nehyba and M. Štefánik, “Applications of deep language models for reflective writings,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2961-2999, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11254-7.
O. Buinytska, T. Terletska, V. Smirnova, A. Tiutiunnyk, I. Kovalenko, and Hrytseliak, “Artificial intelligence in open university ecosystem context,” Informatsiyni texnologii i zacobi navchannya, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 204-221, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/51288.
C. L. Tsang and T. Isaacs, “Hong Kong secondary students’ perspectives on selecting test difficulty level and learner washback: Effects of a graded approach to assessment,” Language Testing, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 212-238, 2022, doi: 10.1177/02655322211050600.
A. A. Sanabria, M. A. Restrepo, E. Walker, and A. Glenberg, “A reading comprehension intervention for dual language learners with weak language and reading skills,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 738-759, 2022, doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00266.
X. Tong, L. Yu, and S. H. Deacon, “A meta-analysis of the relation between syntactic skills and reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic and developmental investigation,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 385-426, 2025, doi: 10.3102/00346543241228185.
K. Landerl, A. Castles, and R. Parrila, “Cognitive precursors of reading: A cross-linguistic perspective,” Scientific Studies of Reading, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 111-124, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2021.1983820.